TSTP Solution File: COL074-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : COL074-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:28:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 20 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(self_referential,axiom,
s = apply(eq,pair(apply(k,s),apply(k,projection2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',self_referential) ).
cnf(k_projection2,axiom,
apply(k,projection2) = k_projection2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',k_projection2) ).
cnf(extensionality1,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| apply(eq,pair(X1,X2)) = projection2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',extensionality1) ).
cnf(k_definition,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(k,X1),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',k_definition) ).
cnf(different_projections,axiom,
projection1 != projection2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',different_projections) ).
cnf(equality,axiom,
apply(eq,pair(X1,X1)) = projection1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p',equality) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
s = apply(eq,pair(apply(k,s),apply(k,projection2))),
self_referential ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
apply(k,projection2) = k_projection2,
k_projection2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(eq,pair(apply(k,s),k_projection2)) = s,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| apply(eq,pair(X1,X2)) = projection2 ),
extensionality1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(k,X1),X2) = X1,
k_definition ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( apply(k,s) = k_projection2
| s = projection2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
apply(k_projection2,X1) = projection2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
projection1 != projection2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[different_projections]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
s = projection2,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
apply(eq,pair(X1,X1)) = projection1,
equality ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
projection1 != projection2,
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]),c_0_7]),c_0_15]),c_0_14]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : COL074-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:06:21 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.G7hp1sBJFV/E---3.1_3631.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 3723 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUPM-FFSS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): FGUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 675s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 150s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 150s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 3730 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUPM-FFSS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): FGUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 675s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 264
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------