TSTP Solution File: COL070-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL070-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m78pwnKTmF true
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:34:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.30s 0.89s
% Output : Refutation 1.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : COL070-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m78pwnKTmF true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:59:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.09/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.09/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.09/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.30/0.89 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.30/0.89 % BCE start: 3
% 1.30/0.89 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.30/0.89 % PE start: 3
% 1.30/0.89 logic: eq
% 1.30/0.89 % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.30/0.89 % done 25 iterations in 0.140s
% 1.30/0.89 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.30/0.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.30/0.89 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 1.30/0.89 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 1.30/0.89 ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 1.30/0.89 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(n1_definition, axiom,
% 1.30/0.89 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ n1 @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 1.30/0.89 ( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Y ) @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ n1 @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 1.30/0.89 = (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [n1_definition])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ n1 @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ X0) @ X2)
% 1.30/0.89 = (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ X0)) @ X2))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 1.30/0.89 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl97, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @
% 1.30/0.89 (apply @ (apply @ n1 @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ X2))) @ X1) @ X0)
% 1.30/0.89 = (apply @ X2 @ (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl458, plain,
% 1.30/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X1) @ X0)
% 1.30/0.89 != (apply @
% 1.30/0.89 (apply @
% 1.30/0.89 (apply @ n1 @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ combinator))) @ X1) @
% 1.30/0.89 X0))),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl97, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.30/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl539, plain, ($false),
% 1.30/0.89 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl458])).
% 1.30/0.89
% 1.30/0.89 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.30/0.89
% 1.30/0.89
% 1.30/0.89 % Terminating...
% 1.47/0.96 % Runner terminated.
% 1.59/0.97 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------