TSTP Solution File: COL066-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : COL066-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:28:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (  14 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_p_combinator,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(w,apply(q,apply(q,q)))),q),x),y),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QxwvA2nuil/E---3.1_32165.p',prove_p_combinator) ).

cnf(w_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QxwvA2nuil/E---3.1_32165.p',w_definition) ).

cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QxwvA2nuil/E---3.1_32165.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(q_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(q,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QxwvA2nuil/E---3.1_32165.p',q_definition) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(w,apply(q,apply(q,q)))),q),x),y),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_p_combinator]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(w,apply(q,apply(q,q)))),q),x),y),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
    w_definition ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    b_definition ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(q,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)),
    q_definition ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(w,apply(apply(w,apply(q,apply(q,q))),apply(q,x))),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(q,X1)),X2) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(apply(q,X1),X2)),X3) = apply(apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(w,q),apply(x,y)),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,q),X1),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09  % Problem    : COL066-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.04/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:05:36 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QxwvA2nuil/E---3.1_32165.p
% 0.14/0.41  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 32242 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 32251 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Result found by U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.14/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.14/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.14/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.14/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.14/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.14/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.14/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 446
% 0.14/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 368
% 0.14/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 446
% 0.14/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 51
% 0.14/0.41  # ...of those cached                   : 23
% 0.14/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.14/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.14/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.14/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 338
% 0.14/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 338
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.14/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.14/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 217
% 0.14/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 34
% 0.14/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7138
% 0.14/0.41  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1556 pages
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  # User time                : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.41  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Total time               : 0.047 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.14/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------