TSTP Solution File: COL063-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : COL063-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:31:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.74s 1.01s
% Output : Proof 4.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.17 % Problem : COL063-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.17 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:05:17 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 4.74/1.01 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 4.74/1.01
% 4.74/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.74/1.01
% 4.74/1.02 % SZS output start Proof
% 4.74/1.02 Axiom 1 (t_definition): apply(apply(t, X), Y) = apply(Y, X).
% 4.74/1.02 Axiom 2 (b_definition): apply(apply(apply(b, X), Y), Z) = apply(X, apply(Y, Z)).
% 4.74/1.02
% 4.74/1.02 Goal 1 (prove_f_combinator): apply(apply(apply(X, f(X)), g(X)), h(X)) = apply(apply(h(X), g(X)), f(X)).
% 4.74/1.02 The goal is true when:
% 4.74/1.02 X = apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))
% 4.74/1.02
% 4.74/1.02 Proof:
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(apply(t, t), apply(apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 1 (t_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), t), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(apply(b, apply(apply(apply(b, b), t), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))), t), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b, b), t), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), apply(t, g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(apply(b, apply(t, f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))), apply(t, g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(t, f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), apply(apply(t, g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 1 (t_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(t, f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), apply(h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))))
% 4.74/1.02 = { by axiom 1 (t_definition) }
% 4.74/1.02 apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))), g(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t))))), f(apply(apply(b, apply(t, t)), apply(apply(b, b), apply(apply(b, b), t)))))
% 4.74/1.02 % SZS output end Proof
% 4.74/1.02
% 4.74/1.02 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------