TSTP Solution File: COL058-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COL058-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.04s 1.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   9 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;  10   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ response > #nlpp > lark

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(response,type,
    response: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(lark,type,
    lark: $i ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ( response(response(lark,X1),X2) = response(X1,response(X2,X2)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    response(response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark)))) != response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X1_1,X2_2] : ( response(response(lark,X1_1),X2_2) = response(X1_1,response(X2_2,X2_2)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_5,plain,
    ! [X1_3,X2_4] : ( response(response(lark,X1_3),X2_4) = response(X1_3,response(X2_4,X2_4)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_198,plain,
    ! [X1_9,X2_10] : ( response(X1_9,response(response(lark,response(X2_10,X2_10)),X2_10)) = response(response(lark,X1_9),response(X2_10,X2_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_5]) ).

tff(c_280,plain,
    ! [X1_9,X2_2] : ( response(X1_9,response(response(response(lark,lark),X2_2),X2_2)) = response(response(lark,X1_9),response(X2_2,X2_2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_198]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    response(response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark)))) != response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_306,plain,
    response(response(response(lark,lark),response(response(lark,response(lark,lark)),response(lark,response(lark,lark)))),response(response(lark,response(lark,lark)),response(lark,response(lark,lark)))) != response(response(response(lark,lark),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),response(lark,response(lark,lark))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_280,c_280,c_4]) ).

tff(c_309,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_2,c_2,c_306]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COL058-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:03:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.04/1.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.20/1.78  
% 3.20/1.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.20/1.82  
% 3.20/1.82  Inference rules
% 3.20/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.20/1.82  #Ref     : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Sup     : 71
% 3.20/1.82  #Fact    : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Define  : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Split   : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Chain   : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Close   : 0
% 3.20/1.82  
% 3.20/1.82  Ordering : KBO
% 3.20/1.82  
% 3.20/1.82  Simplification rules
% 3.20/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.20/1.82  #Subsume      : 7
% 3.20/1.82  #Demod        : 38
% 3.20/1.82  #Tautology    : 18
% 3.20/1.82  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.20/1.82  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.20/1.82  
% 3.20/1.82  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.20/1.82  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.20/1.82  
% 3.20/1.82  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.20/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.20/1.82  Preprocessing        : 0.40
% 3.20/1.82  Parsing              : 0.22
% 3.20/1.82  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.20/1.82  Main loop            : 0.33
% 3.20/1.82  Inferencing          : 0.13
% 3.20/1.82  Reduction            : 0.12
% 3.20/1.82  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 3.20/1.82  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.20/1.82  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.20/1.82  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.20/1.82  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.20/1.82  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.20/1.82  Total                : 0.79
% 3.20/1.82  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.20/1.82  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.20/1.83  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.20/1.83  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------