TSTP Solution File: COL054-1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : COL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:34:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.28s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08  % Problem  : COL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.08  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.07/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.27  % DateTime : Tue May 31 11:39:13 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.28  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(a,response(b,X0)) != X0).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c1, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(a,response(b,X0)) != X0,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(compose(X1,X2),X3) = response(X1,response(X2,X3))).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(b,X0) = response(X1,response(X2,X3))).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c3, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c4, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c5, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	X4 != response(compose(X1,X2),X3) | response(a,X4) != X0,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c6, axiom,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(compose(X5,X6),X7) = response(X5,response(X6,X7))).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(compose(X1,X2),X3) = response(X5,response(X6,X7))).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c7, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(a,X4) != X0,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c8, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c9, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	X8 != response(compose(X5,X6),X7) | X4 != X8,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c10, axiom,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(mocking_bird,X9) = response(X9,X9)).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(compose(X5,X6),X7) = response(X9,X9)).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c11, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	X4 != X8,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c9, c10])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c12, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c9, c10])).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c13, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	X10 != response(mocking_bird,X9) | X8 != X10,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c9, c10])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	X10 = response(mocking_bird,X9)).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c14, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	X8 != X10,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a3])], [c13])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	X8 = X10).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c15, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c14])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	X4 = X8).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c16, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c11])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 0.07/0.28  	response(a,X4) = X0).
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c17, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a6])], [c7])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  cnf(c18, plain,
% 0.07/0.28  	$false,
% 0.07/0.28  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X0, response(X2,X3)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X1, b),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X2, a),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X3, response(X6,X7)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X4, response(mocking_bird,X9)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X5, compose(X1,X2)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X6, mocking_bird),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X7, compose(X5,X6)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X8, response(mocking_bird,X9)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X9, compose(X5,X6)),
% 0.07/0.28  		bind(X10, response(mocking_bird,X9))
% 0.07/0.28  	],
% 0.07/0.28  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6])).
% 0.07/0.28  
% 0.07/0.28  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------