TSTP Solution File: COL054-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : COL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:09:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.91s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   9 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    response(X0,X0) = response(mocking_bird,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mocking_bird_exists) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    response(compose(X0,X1),X2) = response(X0,response(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composer_exists) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( response(a,X0) != X1
    | response(b,X1) != X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_birds_are_compatible) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    response(b,response(a,X0)) != X0,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    response(b,response(a,X0)) != X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    response(X0,response(X1,compose(X0,X1))) = response(mocking_bird,compose(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    response(b,response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X0))) != response(X0,compose(a,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_65]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    response(X0,response(X1,compose(a,compose(X0,X1)))) != response(b,response(mocking_bird,compose(a,compose(X0,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem  : COL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:40:31 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.91/1.10  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------  iProver source info
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.91/1.10  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.91/1.10  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Proving...
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  clauses                                 3
% 1.91/1.10  conjectures                             1
% 1.91/1.10  EPR                                     0
% 1.91/1.10  Horn                                    3
% 1.91/1.10  unary                                   3
% 1.91/1.10  binary                                  0
% 1.91/1.10  lits                                    3
% 1.91/1.10  lits eq                                 3
% 1.91/1.10  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.91/1.10  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.91/1.10  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.91/1.10  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 1.91/1.10  AC symbols                              0
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Schedule UEQ
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ 
% 1.91/1.10  Current options:
% 1.91/1.10  ------ 
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  ------ Proving...
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.91/1.10  
% 1.91/1.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------