TSTP Solution File: COL052-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL052-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.37s 1.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 8 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
response(compose(X0,X1),X2) = response(X0,response(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composer_exists) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
( ~ agreeable(X0)
| response(X0,common_bird(X1)) = response(X1,common_bird(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agreeable1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( response(compatible(X0),X1) != response(X0,X1)
| agreeable(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agreeable2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
agreeable(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_agreeable) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ agreeable(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_is_agreeable) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
compose(a,b) = c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_composes_a_with_b) ).
cnf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
~ agreeable(a),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).
cnf(c_212,plain,
response(a,response(b,X0)) = response(c,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_220,plain,
response(X0,common_bird(X0)) = response(c,common_bird(X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_222,plain,
response(X0,response(X1,common_bird(compose(X0,X1)))) = response(c,common_bird(compose(X0,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_220]) ).
cnf(c_243,plain,
( response(X0,response(X1,common_bird(compose(compatible(X0),X1)))) != response(c,common_bird(compose(compatible(X0),X1)))
| agreeable(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_256,plain,
agreeable(a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_243]) ).
cnf(c_258,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_256,c_115]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COL052-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:34:13 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.37/1.20 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ iProver source info
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.37/1.20 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.37/1.20 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 clauses 6
% 2.37/1.20 conjectures 1
% 2.37/1.20 EPR 2
% 2.37/1.20 Horn 6
% 2.37/1.20 unary 4
% 2.37/1.20 binary 2
% 2.37/1.20 lits 8
% 2.37/1.20 lits eq 4
% 2.37/1.20 fd_pure 0
% 2.37/1.20 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.37/1.20 fd_cond 0
% 2.37/1.20 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.37/1.20 AC symbols 0
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------
% 2.37/1.20 Current options:
% 2.37/1.20 ------
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.37/1.20
% 2.37/1.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------