TSTP Solution File: COL052-2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : COL052-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:05:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   6   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    response(c,common_bird(compose(compatible(a),b))) != response(c,common_bird(compose(compatible(a),b))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f22,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0] : response(a,response(b,X0)) = response(c,X0),
    inference(superposition,[],[f1,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    c = compose(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_composes_a_with_b) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : response(compose(X0,X1),X2) = response(X0,response(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composer_exists) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] : response(c,common_bird(compose(compatible(a),X0))) != response(a,response(X0,common_bird(compose(compatible(a),X0)))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f19,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ~ agreeable(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_is_agreeable) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( agreeable(X0)
      | response(c,common_bird(compose(compatible(X0),X1))) != response(X0,response(X1,common_bird(compose(compatible(X0),X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f3,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : response(X0,response(X1,common_bird(compose(X0,X1)))) = response(c,common_bird(compose(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f8,f1]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0] : response(X0,common_bird(X0)) = response(c,common_bird(X0)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    agreeable(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_agreeable) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ agreeable(X0)
      | response(X0,common_bird(X1)) = response(X1,common_bird(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agreeable1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( response(X0,X3) != response(compatible(X0),X3)
      | agreeable(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agreeable2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : COL052-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 13:23:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.12/0.34  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.73  % (30033)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.73  % (30026)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30033)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.73  
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Memory used [KB]: 946
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30033)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30032)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.73  
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30027)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30032)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.73  % (30028)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30029)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.58/0.73  % (30034)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30029)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Memory used [KB]: 946
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30029)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30026)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30031)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30026)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30031)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)First to succeed.
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-30025"
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30035)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30035)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Memory used [KB]: 1037
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (30028)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (30025)Success in time 0.389 s
% 0.58/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------