TSTP Solution File: COL051-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : COL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:36:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (  41 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mocking_bird_exists,axiom,
    response(mocking_bird,Y) = response(Y,Y) ).

cnf(composer_exists,hypothesis,
    response(compose(X,Y),W) = response(X,response(Y,W)) ).

cnf(prove_the_bird_exists,negated_conjecture,
    response(X,X) != X ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    response(X_1,X_1) != X_1,
    inference(subst,[],[prove_the_bird_exists:[bind(X,$fot(X_1))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,X_1) = response(X_1,X_1),
    inference(subst,[],[mocking_bird_exists:[bind(Y,$fot(X_1))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,X_1) != response(X_1,X_1)
    | response(X_1,X_1) = response(mocking_bird,X_1) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X0,$fot(response(mocking_bird,X_1))),bind(Y0,$fot(response(X_1,X_1)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    response(X_1,X_1) = response(mocking_bird,X_1),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,X_1),response(X_1,X_1)) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( response(X_1,X_1) != response(mocking_bird,X_1)
    | response(mocking_bird,X_1) != X_1
    | response(X_1,X_1) = X_1 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(response(X_1,X_1),X_1) ),[0],$fot(response(mocking_bird,X_1))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,X_1) != X_1
    | response(X_1,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(X_1,X_1),response(mocking_bird,X_1)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,X_1) != X_1,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(X_1,X_1),X_1) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) != response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_1,$fot(response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) = response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5)),
    inference(subst,[],[mocking_bird_exists:[bind(Y,$fot(compose(X_4,X_5)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5)) = response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5))),
    inference(subst,[],[composer_exists:[bind(W,$fot(compose(X_4,X_5))),bind(X,$fot(X_4)),bind(Y,$fot(X_5))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5)) != response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5)))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) != response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) = response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5))) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)),response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5))) ),[1],$fot(response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) != response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) = response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5)),response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5)))) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)) = response(X_4,response(X_5,compose(X_4,X_5))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(X_4,X_5)),response(compose(X_4,X_5),compose(X_4,X_5))) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) = response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(X_4,$fot(mocking_bird)),bind(X_5,$fot(X_9))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) != response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)))
    | response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) = response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X0,$fot(response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)))),bind(Y0,$fot(response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) = response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)),response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)))) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) != response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))
    | response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) != response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))
    | response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) = response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))),response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) ),[1],$fot(response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) != response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))
    | response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) = response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))),response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)) != response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))),response(X_9,compose(mocking_bird,X_9))) )],[refute_0_20,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)) != response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_21:[bind(X_9,$fot(mocking_bird))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)) = response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird)),response(mocking_bird,compose(mocking_bird,mocking_bird))) )],[refute_0_23,refute_0_22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : COL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Tue May 31 11:30:26 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------