TSTP Solution File: COL051-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : COL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:24:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : COL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Tue May 31 11:06:28 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.33 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN
% 0.15/0.33 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.15/0.33 #
% 0.15/0.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.33 # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3
% 0.15/0.33 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.33 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.33 # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.33 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.33 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.33 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.33 # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.33 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.33 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.33 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.33 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.33 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.33 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.33 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.15/0.33 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.15/0.33 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.15/0.33 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.15/0.33 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(X1,X1)!=X1)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (response(compose(X15,X16),X17)!=response(X15,response(X16,X17))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (compose(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X15,X16),X17))=compose(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X15,response(X16,X17)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)!=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (response(compose(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X15,X16),X17)),response(compose(X1,X2),X3))=response(compose(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X15,response(X16,X17))),response(X1,response(X2,X3)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_82, ...])).
% 0.15/0.33 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(X1,X1)!=X1)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X15,X14),X13)=response(X15,response(X14,X13))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X15,X14),X13)=response(X15,response(X14,X13))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (response(response(X15,response(X14,X13)),response(X15,response(X14,X13)))=response(X15,response(X14,X13))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (response(response(X15,response(X14,X13)),response(X15,response(X14,X13)))!=response(compose(X15,X14),X13)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (response(response(X15,response(X14,X13)),response(X15,response(X14,X13)))!=response(mocking_bird,response(X15,response(X14,X13)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (response(mocking_bird,response(X15,response(X14,X13)))!=response(compose(X15,X14),X13)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.15/0.33 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(X1,X1)!=X1)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X12,X13),X14)=response(X12,response(X13,X14))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X12,X13),X14)=response(X12,response(X13,X14))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)!=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X12,X13),X14))=response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X12,response(X13,X14)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)!=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (compose(response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X12,X13),X14)),response(compose(X1,X2),X3))=compose(response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X12,response(X13,X14))),response(X1,response(X2,X3)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])).
% 0.15/0.33 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(X1,X1)!=X1)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.33 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),compose(mocking_bird,X11))=response(mocking_bird,response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),compose(mocking_bird,X11))=response(mocking_bird,response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),compose(mocking_bird,X11))=compose(mocking_bird,X11)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (response(mocking_bird,response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))!=compose(mocking_bird,X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (response(mocking_bird,response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))!=response(response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)),response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.33 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (response(response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)),response(X11,compose(mocking_bird,X11)))!=compose(mocking_bird,X11)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.15/0.33 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.33 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # Child (6300) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.33 # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.33 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------