TSTP Solution File: COL048-1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : COL048-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:12:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL048-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 04:41:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.69/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.69/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.69/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.69/1.09  [
% 0.69/1.09     [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( Y, Z ) ) )
% 0.69/1.09     ],
% 0.69/1.09     [ =( apply( apply( w, X ), Y ), apply( apply( X, Y ), Y ) ) ],
% 0.69/1.09     [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ],
% 0.69/1.09     [ ~( =( X, apply( combinator, X ) ) ) ]
% 0.69/1.09  ] .
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.69/1.09  This is a pure equality problem
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.69/1.09  useparamod =        1
% 0.69/1.09  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.69/1.09  useeqfact =         1
% 0.69/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.69/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.69/1.09  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.69/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.69/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.69/1.09  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.69/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.69/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.69/1.09  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  termordering =      kbo
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  litapriori =        0
% 0.69/1.09  termapriori =       1
% 0.69/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.69/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.69/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.69/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  litselect =         negord
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.69/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.69/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.69/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.69/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.69/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.69/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.69/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.69/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.69/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.69/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.69/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  prologoutput =     1
% 0.69/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.69/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  b  [39, 0]      (w:1, o:9, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  apply  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:46, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  w  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  m  [45, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.09  combinator  [46, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.69/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 0, [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( Y, 
% 0.69/1.09    Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  .
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 2, [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  .
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 3, [ ~( =( apply( combinator, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  .
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 19, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ), apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  .
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 103, [] )
% 0.69/1.09  .
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  initialclauses(
% 0.69/1.09  [ clause( 105, [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    Y, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 106, [ =( apply( apply( w, X ), Y ), apply( apply( X, Y ), Y ) )
% 0.69/1.09     ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 107, [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 108, [ ~( =( X, apply( combinator, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  ] ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 0, [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( Y, 
% 0.69/1.09    Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 105, [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    Y, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z )] ), 
% 0.69/1.09    permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 2, [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 107, [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 116, [ ~( =( apply( combinator, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 108, [ ~( =( X, apply( combinator, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 3, [ ~( =( apply( combinator, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 116, [ ~( =( apply( combinator, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 117, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, Z ) ), apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y
% 0.69/1.09     ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 0, [ =( apply( apply( apply( b, X ), Y ), Z ), apply( X, apply( Y
% 0.69/1.09    , Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 118, [ =( apply( X, X ), apply( m, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 2, [ =( apply( m, X ), apply( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  paramod(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 121, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ), apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 118, [ =( apply( X, X ), apply( m, X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, clause( 117, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, Z ) ), apply( apply( apply( b, X
% 0.69/1.09     ), Y ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, 10, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) )] ), 
% 0.69/1.09    substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, apply( apply( b, X ), Y
% 0.69/1.09     ) )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 19, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ), apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 121, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ), 
% 0.69/1.09    apply( m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.69/1.09     )] ) ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 129, [ =( apply( m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ), apply( X, apply( Y
% 0.69/1.09    , apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 19, [ =( apply( X, apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ), apply( 
% 0.69/1.09    m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 130, [ ~( =( X, apply( combinator, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 3, [ ~( =( apply( combinator, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  resolution(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 131, [] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 130, [ ~( =( X, apply( combinator, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, clause( 129, [ =( apply( m, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ), apply( X, 
% 0.69/1.09    apply( Y, apply( apply( b, X ), Y ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.69/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, apply( m, apply( apply( b, combinator ), m )
% 0.69/1.09     ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, combinator ), :=( Y, m )] )).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.69/1.09  clause( 103, [] )
% 0.69/1.09  , clause( 131, [] )
% 0.69/1.09  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [] ) ).
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  end.
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  space for terms:        1526
% 0.69/1.09  space for clauses:      11247
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  clauses generated:      1931
% 0.69/1.09  clauses kept:           104
% 0.69/1.09  clauses selected:       41
% 0.69/1.09  clauses deleted:        5
% 0.69/1.09  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  subsentry:          484
% 0.69/1.09  literals s-matched: 392
% 0.69/1.09  literals matched:   392
% 0.69/1.09  full subsumption:   0
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  checksum:           -400868921
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  
% 0.69/1.09  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------