TSTP Solution File: COL039-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : COL039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:51:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f40,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f9,f23,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
| ~ sQ0_eqProxy(X1,X2)
| sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X2) ),
inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
<=> X0 = X1 ),
introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ0_eqProxy])]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
! [X0] : ~ sQ0_eqProxy(X0,apply(o,X0)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f12,f20,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( sQ0_eqProxy(apply(X0,X2),apply(X1,X3))
| ~ sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
| ~ sQ0_eqProxy(X2,X3) ),
inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X0] : ~ sQ0_eqProxy(apply(X0,f(X0)),apply(apply(o,X0),f(X0))),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f6,f7,f14]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X1] : ~ sQ0_eqProxy(apply(X1,f(X1)),apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1)))),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f4,f5]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X1] : apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_fixed_point) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X0,X1] : sQ0_eqProxy(apply(apply(o,X0),X1),apply(X1,apply(X0,X1))),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f3,f5]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : apply(apply(o,X0),X1) = apply(X1,apply(X0,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',o_definition) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0] : sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X0),
inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : sQ0_eqProxy(apply(apply(apply(b,X0),X1),X2),apply(X0,apply(X1,X2))),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f1,f5]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : apply(apply(apply(b,X0),X1),X2) = apply(X0,apply(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] : sQ0_eqProxy(apply(m,X0),apply(X0,X0)),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f2,f5]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : apply(m,X0) = apply(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m_definition) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COL039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 17:08:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.49 % (4953)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99788:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99788Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (4959)lrs+10_1:1_br=off:ep=RSTC:sos=all:urr=on:i=20:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/20Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (4969)dis+2_1:1024_abs=on:alpa=false:anc=all_dependent:avsq=on:bce=on:drc=off:newcnf=on:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=reverse_arity:i=353:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/353Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4964)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4977)dis+11_1:64_fd=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:i=481:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/481Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4954)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=10:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/10Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.51 % (4973)lrs+10_1:1_br=off:flr=on:slsq=on:slsqc=1:sp=frequency:urr=on:i=257:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/257Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4956)lrs+10_1:1_amm=off:drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4954)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.51 % (4960)lrs+10_1:1_avsq=on:avsql=on:bsr=unit_only:drc=off:fsr=off:inw=on:nwc=10.0:rnwc=on:sgt=16:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsql=off:slsqr=211,119:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.51
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Time elapsed: 0.111 s
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51 % (4959)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51 % (4948)Success in time 0.166 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------