TSTP Solution File: COL035-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : COL035-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:02:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 13 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_fixed_point) ).
cnf(q_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(q,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_definition) ).
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).
cnf(l_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(l,X1),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_definition) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(q,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)),
q_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
w_definition ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(q,X1)),X2) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
apply(apply(l,X1),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
l_definition ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(w,apply(q,X1)),f(X1)) != apply(X1,f(X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
apply(apply(l,apply(apply(q,X1),X2)),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,apply(X3,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(apply(l,apply(apply(q,q),w)),X1),f(apply(X1,X1))) != apply(apply(X1,X1),f(apply(X1,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COL035-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:10:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 5918 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_206d_02_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 5927 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 53
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 18
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 31
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 439
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 418
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 438
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 95
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 48
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 372
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 372
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 90
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10217
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1548 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------