TSTP Solution File: COL034-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.86s 1.14s
% Output   : Refutation 0.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:09:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.86/1.14  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.86/1.14  Process 14977 was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.86/1.14  Tue May 31 09:09:30 2022
% 0.86/1.14  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_14824_n029.cluster.edu".
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_14824_n029.cluster.edu
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.86/1.14  set(auto2).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.86/1.14      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.86/1.14      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.86/1.14      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.86/1.14  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.86/1.14  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.86/1.14  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.86/1.14  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.86/1.14  clear(print_given).
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  Auto_denials:
% 0.86/1.14    % copying label prove_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % Assigning unary symbol f kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (6).
% 0.86/1.14  Function symbol KB weights:  b=1. m=1. t=1. apply=1. f=0.
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.86/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.86/1.14  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % Proof 1 at 0.18 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_fixed_point.
% 0.86/1.14  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.86/1.14  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.86/1.14  % Maximum clause weight is 50.000.
% 0.86/1.14  % Given clauses 41.
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  1 apply(m,A) = apply(A,A) # label(m_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.86/1.14  2 apply(apply(t,A),B) = apply(B,A) # label(t_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.86/1.14  3 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.86/1.14  4 apply(A,f(A)) != apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) # label(prove_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [assumption].
% 0.86/1.14  5 apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) != apply(A,f(A)) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [copy(4),flip(a)].
% 0.86/1.14  8 apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(b,A),B))) = apply(m,apply(apply(b,A),B)).  [para(3(a,1),1(a,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.86/1.14  12 apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),B)),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))) != apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B)))) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(3(a,1),5(a,1,2)),rewrite([3(19)])].
% 0.86/1.14  19 apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,B),C))),apply(A,apply(B,apply(C,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,B),C))))))) != apply(A,apply(B,apply(C,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,B),C)))))) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(3(a,1),12(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([3(29)])].
% 0.86/1.14  680 apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,apply(t,B)),C))),apply(A,apply(apply(C,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,apply(t,B)),C)))),B))) != apply(A,apply(apply(C,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(b,apply(t,B)),C)))),B)) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(2(a,1),19(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([2(35)])].
% 0.86/1.14  681 $F # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [resolve(680,a,8,a)].
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  Given=41. Generated=2962. Kept=679. proofs=1.
% 0.86/1.14  Usable=39. Sos=563. Demods=90. Limbo=2, Disabled=78. Hints=0.
% 0.86/1.14  Megabytes=1.36.
% 0.86/1.14  User_CPU=0.18, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.86/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.86/1.14  
% 0.86/1.14  Process 14977 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 09:09:30 2022
% 0.86/1.14  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------