TSTP Solution File: COL034-1 by Matita---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Matita---1.0
% Problem  : COL034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:35:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : COL034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  1394: Facts:
% 0.13/0.35  1394:  Id :   2, {_}:
% 0.13/0.35            apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5)
% 0.13/0.35            [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5
% 0.13/0.35  1394:  Id :   3, {_}: apply m ?7 =?= apply ?7 ?7 [7] by m_definition ?7
% 0.13/0.35  1394:  Id :   4, {_}:
% 0.13/0.35            apply (apply t ?9) ?10 =>= apply ?10 ?9
% 0.13/0.35            [10, 9] by t_definition ?9 ?10
% 0.13/0.35  1394: Goal:
% 0.13/0.35  1394:  Id :   1, {_}:
% 0.13/0.35            apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1))
% 0.13/0.35            [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1
% 0.20/0.55  Goal subsumed
% 0.20/0.55  Statistics :
% 0.20/0.55  Max weight : 62
% 0.20/0.55  Found proof, 0.199736s
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   3, {_}: apply m ?7 =?= apply ?7 ?7 [7] by m_definition ?7
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   4, {_}: apply (apply t ?9) ?10 =>= apply ?10 ?9 [10, 9] by t_definition ?9 ?10
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   2, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5
% 0.20/0.55  Id :  11, {_}: apply m (apply (apply b ?29) ?30) =<= apply ?29 (apply ?30 (apply (apply b ?29) ?30)) [30, 29] by Super 2 with 3 at 2
% 0.20/0.55  Id : 2545, {_}: apply (f (apply (apply b m) (apply (apply b (apply t m)) b))) (apply m (apply (apply b (f (apply (apply b m) (apply (apply b (apply t m)) b)))) m)) === apply (f (apply (apply b m) (apply (apply b (apply t m)) b))) (apply m (apply (apply b (f (apply (apply b m) (apply (apply b (apply t m)) b)))) m)) [] by Super 2544 with 11 at 2
% 0.20/0.55  Id : 2544, {_}: apply ?1974 (apply (apply ?1976 (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976)))) ?1975) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976))) (apply ?1974 (apply (apply ?1976 (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976)))) ?1975)) [1975, 1976, 1974] by Demod 2294 with 4 at 2,2
% 0.20/0.55  Id : 2294, {_}: apply ?1974 (apply (apply t ?1975) (apply ?1976 (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976))))) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976))) (apply ?1974 (apply (apply ?1976 (f (apply (apply b ?1974) (apply (apply b (apply t ?1975)) ?1976)))) ?1975)) [1976, 1975, 1974] by Super 53 with 4 at 2,2,3
% 0.20/0.55  Id :  53, {_}: apply ?78 (apply ?79 (apply ?80 (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80))))) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80))) (apply ?78 (apply ?79 (apply ?80 (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80)))))) [80, 79, 78] by Demod 39 with 2 at 2,2
% 0.20/0.55  Id :  39, {_}: apply ?78 (apply (apply (apply b ?79) ?80) (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80)))) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80))) (apply ?78 (apply ?79 (apply ?80 (f (apply (apply b ?78) (apply (apply b ?79) ?80)))))) [80, 79, 78] by Super 8 with 2 at 2,2,3
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   8, {_}: apply ?20 (apply ?21 (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21))) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21)) (apply ?20 (apply ?21 (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21)))) [21, 20] by Demod 7 with 2 at 2
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   7, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?20) ?21) (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21)) =<= apply (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21)) (apply ?20 (apply ?21 (f (apply (apply b ?20) ?21)))) [21, 20] by Super 1 with 2 at 2,3
% 0.20/0.55  Id :   1, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55  1394: solved /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.201692 using nrkbo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------