TSTP Solution File: COL033-1 by EQP---0.9e
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : EQP---0.9e
% Problem : COL033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_eqp %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:23:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 1.11s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,plain,
equal(apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C),apply(A,apply(B,C))),
file('COL033-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,plain,
equal(apply(apply(l,A),B),apply(A,apply(B,B))),
file('COL033-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,plain,
equal(apply(A,apply(B,B)),apply(apply(l,A),B)),
inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2]),
[iquote('flip(2)')] ).
cnf(4,plain,
equal(apply(m,A),apply(A,A)),
file('COL033-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,plain,
equal(apply(A,A),apply(m,A)),
inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4]),
[iquote('flip(4)')] ).
cnf(6,plain,
~ equal(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))),apply(A,f(A))),
inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1]),
[iquote('flip(1)')] ).
cnf(12,plain,
equal(apply(apply(l,A),B),apply(A,apply(m,B))),
inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,3]),1]),
[iquote('para(5,3),flip(1)')] ).
cnf(23,plain,
equal(apply(A,apply(m,apply(l,A))),apply(m,apply(l,A))),
inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,5]),
[iquote('para(12,5)')] ).
cnf(26,plain,
~ equal(apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),B)),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))),
inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,6]),1]),
[iquote('para(1,6),demod([1])')] ).
cnf(27,plain,
$false,
inference(conflict,[status(thm)],[26,23]),
[iquote('conflict(26,23)')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : COL033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_eqp %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue May 31 05:51:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/1.11 ----- EQP 0.9e, May 2009 -----
% 0.71/1.11 The job began on n018.cluster.edu, Tue May 31 05:51:43 2022
% 0.71/1.11 The command was "./eqp09e".
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/1.11 set(lrpo).
% 0.71/1.11 set(basic_paramod).
% 0.71/1.11 set(functional_subsume).
% 0.71/1.11 set(ordered_paramod).
% 0.71/1.11 set(prime_paramod).
% 0.71/1.11 set(para_pairs).
% 0.71/1.11 assign(pick_given_ratio,4).
% 0.71/1.11 clear(print_kept).
% 0.71/1.11 clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.71/1.11 clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.71/1.11 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/1.11 assign(max_mem,64000).
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_commands.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Usable:
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Sos:
% 0.71/1.11 0 (wt=-1) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.71/1.11 0 (wt=-1) [] apply(apply(l,A),B) = apply(A,apply(B,B)).
% 0.71/1.11 0 (wt=-1) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.71/1.11 0 (wt=-1) [] -(apply(A,f(A)) = apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A)))).
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Demodulators:
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Passive:
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Starting to process input.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.71/1.11 1 is a new demodulator.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 2 (wt=11) [] apply(apply(l,A),B) = apply(A,apply(B,B)).
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 3 (wt=11) [flip(2)] apply(A,apply(B,B)) = apply(apply(l,A),B).
% 0.71/1.11 clause forward subsumed: 0 (wt=11) [flip(3)] apply(apply(l,A),B) = apply(A,apply(B,B)).
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 4 (wt=7) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 5 (wt=7) [flip(4)] apply(A,A) = apply(m,A).
% 0.71/1.11 clause forward subsumed: 0 (wt=7) [flip(5)] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ** KEPT: 6 (wt=12) [flip(1)] -(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) = apply(A,f(A))).
% 0.71/1.11 ---------------- PROOF FOUND ----------------
% 0.71/1.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 After processing input:
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Usable:
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Sos:
% 0.71/1.11 4 (wt=7) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.71/1.11 5 (wt=7) [flip(4)] apply(A,A) = apply(m,A).
% 0.71/1.11 2 (wt=11) [] apply(apply(l,A),B) = apply(A,apply(B,B)).
% 0.71/1.11 3 (wt=11) [flip(2)] apply(A,apply(B,B)) = apply(apply(l,A),B).
% 0.71/1.11 6 (wt=12) [flip(1)] -(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) = apply(A,f(A))).
% 0.71/1.11 1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Demodulators:
% 0.71/1.11 1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Passive:
% 0.71/1.11 end_of_list.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 UNIT CONFLICT from 26 and 23 at 0.00 seconds.
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.71/1.11 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.71/1.11 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.71/1.11 Memory dynamically allocated (tp_alloc): 488.
% 0.71/1.11 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.71/1.11 sym_ent ( 96) 56 0 56 0 5.2 K
% 0.71/1.11 term ( 16) 1349 999 350 29 7.3 K
% 0.71/1.11 gen_ptr ( 8) 1419 329 1090 9 8.6 K
% 0.71/1.11 context ( 808) 784 782 2 2 3.2 K
% 0.71/1.11 trail ( 12) 37 37 0 3 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 bt_node ( 68) 166 163 3 4 0.5 K
% 0.71/1.11 ac_position (285432) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 ac_match_pos (14044) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 ac_match_free_vars_pos (4020)
% 0.71/1.11 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 discrim ( 12) 298 109 189 11 2.3 K
% 0.71/1.11 flat ( 40) 1680 1680 0 17 0.7 K
% 0.71/1.11 discrim_pos ( 12) 30 30 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 fpa_head ( 12) 159 0 159 0 1.9 K
% 0.71/1.11 fpa_tree ( 28) 84 84 0 13 0.4 K
% 0.71/1.11 fpa_pos ( 36) 39 39 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.71/1.11 literal ( 12) 89 63 26 0 0.3 K
% 0.71/1.11 clause ( 24) 89 63 26 0 0.6 K
% 0.71/1.11 list ( 12) 72 16 56 3 0.7 K
% 0.71/1.11 list_pos ( 20) 113 49 64 1 1.3 K
% 0.71/1.11 pair_index ( 40) 2 0 2 0 0.1 K
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 -------------- statistics -------------
% 0.71/1.11 Clauses input 4
% 0.71/1.11 Usable input 0
% 0.71/1.11 Sos input 4
% 0.71/1.11 Demodulators input 0
% 0.71/1.11 Passive input 0
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Processed BS (before search) 8
% 0.71/1.11 Forward subsumed BS 2
% 0.71/1.11 Kept BS 6
% 0.71/1.11 New demodulators BS 1
% 0.71/1.11 Back demodulated BS 0
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Clauses or pairs given 20
% 0.71/1.11 Clauses generated 39
% 0.71/1.11 Forward subsumed 19
% 0.71/1.11 Deleted by weight 0
% 0.71/1.11 Deleted by variable count 0
% 0.71/1.11 Kept 20
% 0.71/1.11 New demodulators 12
% 0.71/1.11 Back demodulated 10
% 0.71/1.11 Ordered paramod prunes 0
% 0.71/1.11 Basic paramod prunes 6
% 0.71/1.11 Prime paramod prunes 0
% 0.71/1.11 Semantic prunes 0
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Rewrite attmepts 476
% 0.71/1.11 Rewrites 18
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 FPA overloads 0
% 0.71/1.11 FPA underloads 0
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Usable size 0
% 0.71/1.11 Sos size 15
% 0.71/1.11 Demodulators size 9
% 0.71/1.11 Passive size 0
% 0.71/1.11 Disabled size 10
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 Proofs found 1
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 ----------- times (seconds) ----------- Tue May 31 05:51:43 2022
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 user CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.71/1.11 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.71/1.11 wall-clock time 0 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.71/1.11 input time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 paramodulation time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 demodulation time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 orient time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 weigh time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 forward subsume time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 back demod find time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 conflict time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 LRPO time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 store clause time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 disable clause time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 prime paramod time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11 semantics time 0.00
% 0.71/1.11
% 0.71/1.11 EQP interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------