TSTP Solution File: COL022-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : COL022-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:28:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   9 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
    X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C5HeslcGm6/E---3.1_32209.p',prove_fixed_point) ).

cnf(m_definition,axiom,
    apply(m,X1) = apply(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C5HeslcGm6/E---3.1_32209.p',m_definition) ).

cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C5HeslcGm6/E---3.1_32209.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_fixed_point]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    apply(m,X1) = apply(X1,X1),
    m_definition ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    b_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(apply(b,X1),X2))) = apply(m,apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    apply(m,apply(apply(b,combinator),X1)) != apply(X1,apply(apply(b,combinator),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : COL022-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:14:30 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C5HeslcGm6/E---3.1_32209.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 32330 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 32334 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 17
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 182
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 166
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 181
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 54
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 20
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 146
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 146
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3396
% 0.21/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1544 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------