TSTP Solution File: COL020-1 by Matita---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Matita---1.0
% Problem  : COL020-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:35:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.71s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COL020-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 04:58:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  1818: Facts:
% 0.13/0.34  1818:  Id :   2, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            apply (apply (apply s ?3) ?4) ?5
% 0.13/0.34            =?=
% 0.13/0.34            apply (apply ?3 ?5) (apply ?4 ?5)
% 0.13/0.34            [5, 4, 3] by s_definition ?3 ?4 ?5
% 0.13/0.34  1818:  Id :   3, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            apply (apply (apply b ?7) ?8) ?9 =>= apply ?7 (apply ?8 ?9)
% 0.13/0.34            [9, 8, 7] by b_definition ?7 ?8 ?9
% 0.13/0.34  1818:  Id :   4, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            apply (apply (apply c ?11) ?12) ?13 =>= apply (apply ?11 ?13) ?12
% 0.13/0.34            [13, 12, 11] by c_definition ?11 ?12 ?13
% 0.13/0.34  1818: Goal:
% 0.13/0.34  1818:  Id :   1, {_}: ?1 =<= apply combinator ?1 [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1
% 3.71/1.26  Goal subsumed
% 3.71/1.26  Statistics :
% 3.71/1.26  Max weight : 58
% 3.71/1.26  Found proof, 0.916713s
% 3.71/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.26  Id :   2, {_}: apply (apply (apply s ?3) ?4) ?5 =?= apply (apply ?3 ?5) (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by s_definition ?3 ?4 ?5
% 3.71/1.26  Id :   4, {_}: apply (apply (apply c ?11) ?12) ?13 =?= apply (apply ?11 ?13) ?12 [13, 12, 11] by c_definition ?11 ?12 ?13
% 3.71/1.26  Id :   3, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?7) ?8) ?9 =>= apply ?7 (apply ?8 ?9) [9, 8, 7] by b_definition ?7 ?8 ?9
% 3.71/1.26  Id :  39, {_}: apply (apply (apply c (apply b ?171)) ?172) ?173 =?= apply ?171 (apply ?173 ?172) [173, 172, 171] by Super 3 with 4 at 2
% 3.71/1.26  Id : 578, {_}: apply (apply (apply c (apply b combinator)) (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator)))) (apply (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator))) (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator)))) === apply (apply (apply c (apply b combinator)) (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator)))) (apply (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator))) (apply s (apply c (apply b combinator)))) [] by Super 577 with 2 at 2
% 3.71/1.26  Id : 577, {_}: apply ?2789 ?2790 =?= apply (apply (apply c (apply b combinator)) ?2790) ?2789 [2790, 2789] by Super 1 with 39 at 3
% 3.71/1.26  Id :   1, {_}: ?1 =<= apply combinator ?1 [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1
% 3.71/1.26  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.26  1820: solved /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.917631 using lpo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------