TSTP Solution File: COL019-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COL019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : COL019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 31 14:42:13 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/0.34 Tue May 31 14:42:13 2022
% 0.17/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27490.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.17/0.34 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,8,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,9,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(t,A),B)=apply(B,A).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.36 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.36 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.36 number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.17/0.36 number of clauses initially in problem: 8
% 0.17/0.36 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 12
% 0.17/0.36 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 50
% 0.17/0.36 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.36 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.17/0.36 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.17/0.36 distinct function count: 1
% 0.17/0.36 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36
% 0.17/0.36 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.17/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.01 sec ----> 81 [binary,80.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.17/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 1 [] {-} A!=apply(combinator,A).
% 0.17/0.37 2 [copy,1,flip.1] {+} apply(combinator,A)!=A.
% 0.17/0.37 3 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 0.17/0.37 4 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C)=apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.17/0.37 6 [] {-} apply(apply(t,A),B)=apply(B,A).
% 0.17/0.37 8 [copy,3,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(apply(apply(s,A),C),B).
% 0.17/0.37 9 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} apply(A,B)=apply(apply(t,B),A).
% 0.17/0.37 10 [para_into,9.1.1,6.1.1,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(t,A),apply(t,B))=apply(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37 51 [para_into,8.1.1,10.1.1] {-} apply(A,A)=apply(apply(apply(s,t),t),A).
% 0.17/0.37 80 [para_into,51.1.1,4.1.1] {-} apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(b,A),B)))=apply(apply(apply(s,t),t),apply(apply(b,A),B)).
% 0.17/0.37 81 [binary,80.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.37 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 ============ end of search ============
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 true clauses given 2 (15.4%)
% 0.17/0.37 false clauses given 11
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 FALSE TRUE
% 0.17/0.37 11 1 0
% 0.17/0.37 13 7 0
% 0.17/0.37 15 5 0
% 0.17/0.37 17 19 0
% 0.17/0.37 19 2 0
% 0.17/0.37 21 10 0
% 0.17/0.37 23 4 0
% 0.17/0.37 25 4 0
% 0.17/0.37 tot: 52 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.17/0.37
% 0.17/0.37 Process 27490 finished Tue May 31 14:42:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------