TSTP Solution File: COL014-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : COL014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:28:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.81s 0.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 6 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.guBT8rdbvm/E---3.1_29669.p',prove_fixed_point) ).
cnf(l_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(l,X1),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.guBT8rdbvm/E---3.1_29669.p',l_definition) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(combinator,X1),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(l,X1),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
l_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(l,combinator),X1) != apply(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:30:03 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.guBT8rdbvm/E---3.1_29669.p
% 0.81/0.99 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.81/0.99 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.81/0.99 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 29766 completed with status 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.81/0.99 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.81/0.99 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.81/0.99 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.81/0.99 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 29770 completed with status 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.81/0.99 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.81/0.99 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.81/0.99 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.81/0.99 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.81/0.99 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.81/0.99 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.81/0.99 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 # Proof found!
% 0.81/0.99 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/0.99 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.81/0.99 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.81/0.99 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.81/0.99 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.81/0.99 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.81/0.99 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.81/0.99 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Generated clauses : 17
% 0.81/0.99 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.81/0.99 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.81/0.99 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # NegExts : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.81/0.99 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.81/0.99 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.81/0.99 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.81/0.99 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.81/0.99 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.81/0.99 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.81/0.99 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.81/0.99 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.81/0.99 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.81/0.99 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.81/0.99 # Termbank termtop insertions : 245
% 0.81/0.99 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.99 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.81/0.99 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.81/0.99 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.81/0.99 # Maximum resident set size: 1548 pages
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.99 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.81/0.99 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.81/0.99 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.81/0.99 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.81/0.99 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------