TSTP Solution File: COL008-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : COL008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.78s 1.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 (; 13 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ apply > #nlpp > m > combinator > b
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(m,type,
m: $i ).
tff(apply,type,
apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(combinator,type,
combinator: $i ).
tff(b,type,
b: $i ).
tff(f_31,axiom,
! [X] : ( apply(m,X) = apply(X,X) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z] : ( apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),Z) = apply(X,apply(Y,Z)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_34,axiom,
! [Y] : ( Y != apply(combinator,Y) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [X_4] : ( apply(m,X_4) = apply(X_4,X_4) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).
tff(c_25,plain,
! [X_8,Y_9,Z_10] : ( apply(apply(apply(b,X_8),Y_9),Z_10) = apply(X_8,apply(Y_9,Z_10)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_112,plain,
! [X_13,Y_14] : ( apply(X_13,apply(Y_14,apply(apply(b,X_13),Y_14))) = apply(m,apply(apply(b,X_13),Y_14)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_25]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [Y_5] : ( apply(combinator,Y_5) != Y_5 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_155,plain,
! [Y_14] : ( apply(m,apply(apply(b,combinator),Y_14)) != apply(Y_14,apply(apply(b,combinator),Y_14)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_112,c_6]) ).
tff(c_214,plain,
$false,
inference(reflexivity,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_155]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : COL008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:41:06 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.78/1.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.78/1.71
% 2.78/1.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.78/1.73
% 2.78/1.73 Inference rules
% 2.78/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.78/1.73 #Ref : 1
% 2.78/1.73 #Sup : 47
% 2.78/1.73 #Fact : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Define : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Split : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Chain : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Close : 0
% 2.78/1.73
% 2.78/1.73 Ordering : KBO
% 2.78/1.73
% 2.78/1.73 Simplification rules
% 2.78/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.78/1.73 #Subsume : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Demod : 16
% 2.78/1.73 #Tautology : 15
% 2.78/1.73 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.78/1.73 #BackRed : 0
% 2.78/1.73
% 2.78/1.73 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.78/1.73 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.78/1.73
% 2.78/1.73 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.78/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.78/1.73 Preprocessing : 0.37
% 2.78/1.73 Parsing : 0.20
% 2.78/1.73 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.78/1.73 Main loop : 0.28
% 2.78/1.73 Inferencing : 0.13
% 2.78/1.73 Reduction : 0.09
% 2.78/1.73 Demodulation : 0.07
% 2.78/1.73 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 2.78/1.73 Subsumption : 0.04
% 2.78/1.73 Abstraction : 0.02
% 2.78/1.73 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.78/1.73 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.78/1.73 Total : 0.70
% 2.78/1.73 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.78/1.73 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.78/1.73 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.78/1.73 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------