TSTP Solution File: COL006-5 by Twee---2.5.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.5.0
% Problem : COL006-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:50:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.79s 0.71s
% Output : Proof 2.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : COL006-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 15:55:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.79/0.71 Command-line arguments: --flatten
% 2.79/0.71
% 2.79/0.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.79/0.71
% 2.79/0.72 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.79/0.72 Axiom 1 (k_definition): apply(apply(k, X), Y) = X.
% 2.79/0.72 Axiom 2 (s_definition): apply(apply(apply(s, X), Y), Z) = apply(apply(X, Z), apply(Y, Z)).
% 2.79/0.72 Axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point): strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(s, k), k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k))).
% 2.79/0.72
% 2.79/0.72 Lemma 4: apply(apply(apply(s, k), X), Y) = Y.
% 2.79/0.72 Proof:
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, k), X), Y)
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(k, Y), apply(X, Y))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 1 (k_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 Y
% 2.79/0.72
% 2.79/0.72 Lemma 5: apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, X)), Y), Z) = apply(X, apply(Y, Z)).
% 2.79/0.72 Proof:
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, X)), Y), Z)
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(k, X), Z), apply(Y, Z))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 1 (k_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(X, apply(Y, Z))
% 2.79/0.72
% 2.79/0.72 Lemma 6: apply(apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), Y)), apply(apply(s, k), Z)), X) = apply(X, X).
% 2.79/0.72 Proof:
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), Y)), apply(apply(s, k), Z)), X)
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(apply(s, k), Y), X), apply(apply(apply(s, k), Z), X))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 4 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(X, apply(apply(apply(s, k), Z), X))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 4 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(X, X)
% 2.79/0.72
% 2.79/0.72 Goal 1 (prove_strong_fixed_point): apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt) = apply(fixed_pt, apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt)).
% 2.79/0.72 Proof:
% 2.79/0.72 apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt)
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(s, k), k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k))), fixed_pt)
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 5 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 6 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 5 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(s, k), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt))), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, k), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 4 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k), fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 5 }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(apply(apply(k, fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)), apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 1 (k_definition) }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k)), fixed_pt)))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, apply(apply(s, k), k)), apply(apply(s, k), k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, apply(apply(s, s), apply(s, k)))), apply(apply(s, apply(k, s)), k))), fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 = { by axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point) R->L }
% 2.79/0.72 apply(fixed_pt, apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt))
% 2.79/0.72 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.79/0.72
% 2.79/0.72 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------