TSTP Solution File: COL004-3 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : COL004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
equal(apply(apply(apply(s,u),v),w),apply(apply(u,w),apply(v,w))),
file('COL004-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
equal(apply(apply(k,u),v),u),
file('COL004-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
~ equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(s,apply(k,apply(s,apply(apply(s,k),k)))),apply(apply(s,apply(apply(s,k),k)),apply(apply(s,k),k))),x__dfg),y__dfg),apply(y__dfg,apply(apply(x__dfg,x__dfg),y__dfg))),
file('COL004-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,plain,
~ equal(apply(y__dfg,apply(apply(x__dfg,x__dfg),y__dfg)),apply(y__dfg,apply(apply(x__dfg,x__dfg),y__dfg))),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,3,1]),
[iquote('0:Rew:2.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,2.0,3.0,2.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,1.0,3.0')] ).
cnf(5,plain,
$false,
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4]),
[iquote('0:Obv:4.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : COL004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue May 31 12:54:21 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.14/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.14/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.42 SPASS derived 0 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3 clauses.
% 0.14/0.42 SPASS allocated 63093 KBytes.
% 0.14/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.05 on the problem.
% 0.14/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.14/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.14/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.14/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.14/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 0, length 5 :
% 0.14/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : s_definition k_definition prove_u_combinator
% 0.14/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------