TSTP Solution File: COL003-7 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : COL003-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.89s 2.17s
% Output : Refutation 1.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : COL003-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:29:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 1.89/2.17 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 1.89/2.17 Process 8828 was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 1.89/2.17 Tue May 31 08:29:26 2022
% 1.89/2.17 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_8675_n019.cluster.edu".
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_8675_n019.cluster.edu
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.89/2.17 set(auto2).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 1.89/2.17 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 1.89/2.17 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 1.89/2.17 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 1.89/2.17 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 1.89/2.17 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 1.89/2.17 assign(order,kbo).
% 1.89/2.17 set(lex_order_vars).
% 1.89/2.17 clear(print_given).
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Auto_denials:
% 1.89/2.17 % copying label prove_strong_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Term ordering decisions:
% 1.89/2.17 Function symbol KB weights: fixed_pt=1. b=1. w=1. apply=1.
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=45.000, iters=3682
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=43.000, iters=3656
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=39.000, iters=3483
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=37.000, iters=3357
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=35.000, iters=3380
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3497
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3367
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.89/2.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.89/2.17 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % Proof 1 at 1.16 (+ 0.02) seconds: prove_strong_fixed_point.
% 1.89/2.17 % Length of proof is 12.
% 1.89/2.17 % Level of proof is 4.
% 1.89/2.17 % Maximum clause weight is 29.000.
% 1.89/2.17 % Given clauses 162.
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 1 apply(apply(w,A),B) = apply(apply(A,B),B) # label(w_definition) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.89/2.17 2 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.89/2.17 3 -fixed_point(apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(b,w))),b)),b)) # label(prove_strong_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point). [assumption].
% 1.89/2.17 4 apply(A,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(A,fixed_pt)) | fixed_point(A) # label(strong_fixed_point) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.89/2.17 5 apply(fixed_pt,apply(A,fixed_pt)) != apply(A,fixed_pt) | fixed_point(A). [copy(4),flip(a)].
% 1.89/2.17 7 apply(apply(w,w),A) = apply(apply(A,A),A). [para(1(a,1),1(a,2))].
% 1.89/2.17 9 apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,A),B)),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(B,C)),C). [para(2(a,1),1(a,2,1))].
% 1.89/2.17 13 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point). [ur(5,b,3,a),rewrite([2(20),2(18),2(16),2(34),2(32),2(30)])].
% 1.89/2.17 35 apply(apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(b,A),B))),apply(apply(b,A),B)) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,A),B)). [para(2(a,1),7(a,2,1)),flip(a)].
% 1.89/2.17 187 apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,apply(b,A)),B)),C) = apply(A,apply(apply(B,C),C)). [para(9(a,2),2(a,1))].
% 1.89/2.17 5622 apply(A,apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,A))))) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,A)))). [para(187(a,1),35(a,1)),rewrite([2(17),35(24)])].
% 1.89/2.17 5623 $F # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point). [resolve(5622,a,13,a)].
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Given=162. Generated=26770. Kept=5621. proofs=1.
% 1.89/2.17 Usable=148. Sos=4663. Demods=1100. Limbo=44, Disabled=769. Hints=0.
% 1.89/2.17 Megabytes=8.23.
% 1.89/2.17 User_CPU=1.16, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 THEOREM PROVED
% 1.89/2.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.89/2.17
% 1.89/2.17 Process 8828 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 08:29:27 2022
% 1.89/2.17 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------