TSTP Solution File: COL003-18 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : COL003-18 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:28:33 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8wwl58lozv/E---3.1_3282.p',w_definition) ).

cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8wwl58lozv/E---3.1_3282.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(strong_fixed_point,axiom,
    strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(b,w))),apply(apply(b,b),b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8wwl58lozv/E---3.1_3282.p',strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8wwl58lozv/E---3.1_3282.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
    w_definition ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    b_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(X1,X2)),X2) = apply(apply(w,apply(w,X1)),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),X3) = apply(apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(b,X1)),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,w),X1)),X2) = apply(apply(w,apply(w,X1)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X2,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    apply(apply(w,w),X1) = apply(apply(X1,X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(b,w))),apply(apply(b,b),b)),
    strong_fixed_point ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(w,X1)),apply(apply(b,w),X1)) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),X2) = apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]),c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X1)) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem    : COL003-18 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:32:01 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8wwl58lozv/E---3.1_3282.p
% 0.16/0.47  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3359 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.47  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 3363 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.47  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.47  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.16/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.16/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.16/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 148
% 0.16/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 36
% 0.16/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 55
% 0.16/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.16/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.16/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 2698
% 0.16/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2584
% 0.16/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 2698
% 0.16/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 864
% 0.16/0.47  # ...of those cached                   : 444
% 0.16/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 50
% 0.16/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 33
% 0.16/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 0.16/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2433
% 0.16/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2433
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.16/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.16/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1101
% 0.16/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 33
% 0.16/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 72263
% 0.16/0.47  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 0.16/0.47  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1540 pages
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47  # User time                : 0.191 s
% 0.16/0.47  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Total time               : 0.202 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.16/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------