TSTP Solution File: COL003-17 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL003-17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.29s 2.59s
% Output   : Refutation 2.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL003-17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:46:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 2.29/2.59  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 2.29/2.59  Process 4428 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 2.29/2.59  Tue May 31 09:46:43 2022
% 2.29/2.59  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_4275_n025.cluster.edu".
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4275_n025.cluster.edu
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.29/2.59  set(auto2).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 2.29/2.59      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 2.29/2.59      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 2.29/2.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 2.29/2.59  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 2.29/2.59  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 2.29/2.59  assign(order,kbo).
% 2.29/2.59  set(lex_order_vars).
% 2.29/2.59  clear(print_given).
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Auto_denials:
% 2.29/2.59    % copying label prove_strong_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Term ordering decisions:
% 2.29/2.59  Function symbol KB weights:  b=1. w=1. strong_fixed_point=1. fixed_pt=1. apply=1.
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Low Water (keep): wt=71.000, iters=3423
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Low Water (keep): wt=47.000, iters=3350
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Low Water (keep): wt=45.000, iters=3380
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 2.29/2.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.29/2.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % Proof 1 at 1.50 (+ 0.02) seconds: prove_strong_fixed_point.
% 2.29/2.59  % Length of proof is 11.
% 2.29/2.59  % Level of proof is 4.
% 2.29/2.59  % Maximum clause weight is 29.000.
% 2.29/2.59  % Given clauses 97.
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  1 apply(apply(w,A),B) = apply(apply(A,B),B) # label(w_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 2.29/2.59  2 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 2.29/2.59  3 strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(b,w))),b)),b) # label(strong_fixed_point) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 2.29/2.59  4 apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)) # label(prove_strong_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [assumption].
% 2.29/2.59  5 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [copy(4),rewrite([3(1),2(19),2(17),2(15),3(15),2(33),2(31),2(29)]),flip(a)].
% 2.29/2.59  7 apply(apply(w,w),A) = apply(apply(A,A),A).  [para(1(a,1),1(a,2))].
% 2.29/2.59  9 apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,A),B)),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(B,C)),C).  [para(2(a,1),1(a,2,1))].
% 2.29/2.59  28 apply(apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(b,A),B))),apply(apply(b,A),B)) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,A),B)).  [para(2(a,1),7(a,2,1)),flip(a)].
% 2.29/2.59  189 apply(apply(w,apply(apply(b,apply(b,A)),B)),C) = apply(A,apply(apply(B,C),C)).  [para(9(a,2),2(a,1))].
% 2.29/2.59  7161 apply(A,apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,A))))) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(apply(b,w),apply(b,apply(b,A)))).  [para(189(a,1),28(a,1)),rewrite([2(17),28(24)])].
% 2.29/2.59  7162 $F # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [resolve(7161,a,5,a)].
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Given=97. Generated=28187. Kept=7160. proofs=1.
% 2.29/2.59  Usable=89. Sos=5622. Demods=1959. Limbo=54, Disabled=1398. Hints=0.
% 2.29/2.59  Megabytes=10.88.
% 2.29/2.59  User_CPU=1.50, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=2.
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  ============================== end of search =========================
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  THEOREM PROVED
% 2.29/2.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 2.29/2.59  
% 2.29/2.59  Process 4428 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 09:46:45 2022
% 2.29/2.59  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------