TSTP Solution File: COL003-13 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : COL003-13 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:27:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 15 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NGl3DiDlCm/E---3.1_10786.p',w_definition) ).
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NGl3DiDlCm/E---3.1_10786.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(strong_fixed_point,axiom,
strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NGl3DiDlCm/E---3.1_10786.p',strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NGl3DiDlCm/E---3.1_10786.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
w_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(b,X1)),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
apply(apply(apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X2,X2),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),X1) = apply(apply(X1,X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b)),
strong_fixed_point ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),X2) = apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]),c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X1)) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : COL003-13 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:33:18 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NGl3DiDlCm/E---3.1_10786.p
% 0.69/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.69/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # new_bool_1 with pid 10931 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.69/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.69/0.56 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.69/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 10938 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.69/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.69/0.56 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.69/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.69/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.69/0.56
% 0.69/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.69/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.69/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.69/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.69/0.56 # Processed clauses : 148
% 0.69/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 36
% 0.69/0.56 # ...subsumed : 55
% 0.69/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.69/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.69/0.56 # Generated clauses : 2698
% 0.69/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2584
% 0.69/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Paramodulations : 2698
% 0.69/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 861
% 0.69/0.56 # ...of those cached : 446
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.69/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.69/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34
% 0.69/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 0.69/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2433
% 0.69/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 2433
% 0.69/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.69/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 88
% 0.69/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1110
% 0.69/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 32
% 0.69/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.69/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 72271
% 0.69/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.69/0.56
% 0.69/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.56 # User time : 0.049 s
% 0.69/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.69/0.56 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 0.69/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.69/0.56
% 0.69/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.56 # User time : 0.052 s
% 0.69/0.56 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.69/0.56 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 0.69/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.69/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.69/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------