TSTP Solution File: COL002-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : COL002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:02:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 12 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(s_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s_definition) ).
cnf(i_definition,axiom,
apply(i,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_definition) ).
cnf(prove_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(fixed_pt,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_fixed_point) ).
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)),
s_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(i,X1) = X1,
i_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(fixed_pt,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(apply(s,X1),i),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
X1 != apply(fixed_pt,X1),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
apply(apply(apply(s,apply(b,X1)),i),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(apply(s,apply(b,fixed_pt)),i),X1) != apply(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : COL002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:21:22 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 27649 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27657 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 276
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 250
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 275
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 42
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of those cached : 26
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 241
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 241
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 104
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4644
% 0.16/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1544 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------