TSTP Solution File: COL001-2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL001-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZZJDn4Tx7C true

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:34:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.20s 0.83s
% Output   : Refutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : COL001-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZZJDn4Tx7C true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:42:39 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.08/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.20/0.83  % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 1.20/0.83  % done 20 iterations in 0.063s
% 1.20/0.83  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.20/0.83  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.20/0.83  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(s_type, type, s: $i).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(i_type, type, i: $i).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(i_definition, axiom, (( apply @ i @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((apply @ i @ X0) = (X0))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [i_definition])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(s_definition, axiom,
% 1.20/0.83    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ s @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 1.20/0.83     ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Z ) @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.20/0.83         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 1.20/0.83           = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [s_definition])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.20/0.83         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ X1) @ i) @ X0)
% 1.20/0.83           = (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 1.20/0.83    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 1.20/0.83     ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.20/0.83         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 1.20/0.83           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.20/0.83         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ i) @ X0)
% 1.20/0.83           = (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 1.20/0.83    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl215, plain,
% 1.20/0.83      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.20/0.83         ((apply @ X0 @ X0)
% 1.20/0.83           != (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ (apply @ b @ combinator)) @ i) @ 
% 1.20/0.83               X0))),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.20/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl252, plain, ($false),
% 1.20/0.83      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl215])).
% 1.20/0.83  
% 1.20/0.83  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.20/0.83  
% 1.20/0.83  
% 1.20/0.83  % Terminating...
% 1.20/0.87  % Runner terminated.
% 1.20/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------