TSTP Solution File: CAT033+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CAT033+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:59:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.27s 3.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 11 unt; 5 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 5 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_791,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,k12_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_791) ).
cnf(i_0_2239,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk388_0,u1_cat_1(esk387_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_2239) ).
cnf(i_0_2241,negated_conjecture,
v2_cat_1(esk387_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_2241) ).
cnf(i_0_2240,negated_conjecture,
l1_cat_1(esk387_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_2240) ).
cnf(i_0_247,plain,
( k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)) = k1_yoneda_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_247) ).
cnf(i_0_1011,plain,
( ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_1011) ).
cnf(i_0_317,plain,
( k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3) = k20_ens_1(X2,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_317) ).
cnf(i_0_1187,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_1187) ).
cnf(i_0_2238,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk387_0,esk388_0),esk387_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk387_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ja4xkmx/lgb.p',i_0_2238) ).
cnf(c_0_2251,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,k12_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2)) ),
i_0_791 ).
cnf(c_0_2252,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk388_0,u1_cat_1(esk387_0)),
i_0_2239 ).
cnf(c_0_2253,negated_conjecture,
v2_cat_1(esk387_0),
i_0_2241 ).
cnf(c_0_2254,negated_conjecture,
l1_cat_1(esk387_0),
i_0_2240 ).
cnf(c_0_2255,negated_conjecture,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,esk387_0,esk388_0),esk387_0,k12_ens_1(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2251,c_0_2252]),c_0_2253]),c_0_2254])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2256,plain,
( k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)) = k1_yoneda_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
i_0_247 ).
cnf(c_0_2257,plain,
( ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
i_0_1011 ).
cnf(c_0_2258,plain,
( k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3) = k20_ens_1(X2,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X2),X1) ),
i_0_317 ).
cnf(c_0_2259,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
i_0_1187 ).
cnf(c_0_2260,plain,
( m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1),esk387_0,esk388_0),esk387_0,k1_yoneda_1(X1))
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2255,c_0_2256]),c_0_2257]) ).
cnf(c_0_2261,plain,
( k24_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1),X1,X2) = k20_ens_1(X1,X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2258,c_0_2259]),c_0_2257]) ).
cnf(c_0_2262,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk387_0,esk388_0),esk387_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk387_0)),
i_0_2238 ).
cnf(c_0_2263,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2260,c_0_2261]),c_0_2253]),c_0_2254]),c_0_2252])]),c_0_2262]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CAT033+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 19:46:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.27/3.83 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.27/3.83 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.27/3.83 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.27/3.83 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.27/3.83 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.27/3.83 #
% 9.27/3.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 9.27/3.83 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.27/3.83
% 9.27/3.83 # Proof found!
% 9.27/3.83 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.27/3.83 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.27/3.83 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.27/3.83
% 9.27/3.83 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.27/3.83 # User time : 0.031 s
% 9.27/3.83 # System time : 0.005 s
% 9.27/3.83 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 9.27/3.83 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 9.27/3.83
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------