TSTP Solution File: CAT033+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CAT033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:59:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 29 ~; 24 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 1 sgn 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t49_ens_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v2_cat_1(X2)
& l1_cat_1(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2))
=> ( r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X2),X1)
=> m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X2,X3),X2,k12_ens_1(X1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t49_ens_1) ).
fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
fof(fc5_ens_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( v2_cat_1(X1)
& l1_cat_1(X1) )
=> ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc5_ens_1) ).
fof(t2_yoneda_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( v2_cat_1(X1)
& l1_cat_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1))
=> m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X1,X2),X1,k1_yoneda_1(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_yoneda_1) ).
fof(d1_yoneda_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( v2_cat_1(X1)
& l1_cat_1(X1) )
=> k1_yoneda_1(X1) = k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_yoneda_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( v1_xboole_0(X4)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X5)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X5)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_cat_1(X5))
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X5),X4)
| m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X5,X6),X5,k12_ens_1(X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t49_ens_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3] : r1_tarski(X3,X3),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc5_ens_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( v2_cat_1(X1)
& l1_cat_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1))
=> m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X1,X2),X1,k1_yoneda_1(X1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_yoneda_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X1,X2),X1,k12_ens_1(X3))
| v1_xboole_0(X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X1),X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| k1_yoneda_1(X2) = k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_yoneda_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( v2_cat_1(esk1_0)
& l1_cat_1(esk1_0)
& m1_subset_1(esk2_0,u1_cat_1(esk1_0))
& ~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X1,X2),X1,k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( k1_yoneda_1(X1) = k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(X1,X2),X1,k1_yoneda_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,u1_cat_1(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
l1_cat_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
v2_cat_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CAT033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 23:10:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 22
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.21/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 19
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses : 52
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 52
% 0.21/1.40 # Processed clauses : 109
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...subsumed : 16
% 0.21/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 93
% 0.21/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Generated clauses : 125
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 112
% 0.21/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 0.21/1.40 # Paramodulations : 125
% 0.21/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 87
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 64
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54
% 0.21/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 372
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.21/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1311
% 0.21/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 389
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30
% 0.21/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 88
% 0.21/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6405
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.21/1.40 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 3392 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------