TSTP Solution File: CAT018-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : CAT018-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:18:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CAT018-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:08:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.50  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.51  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.20/0.51    fof(assume_ab_exists, hypothesis, defined(a, b)).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(assume_bc_exists, hypothesis, defined(b, c)).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(category_theory_axiom1, axiom, ![X, Y, Z, Xy, Yz]: (~product(X, Y, Xy) | (~product(Y, Z, Yz) | (~defined(Xy, Z) | defined(X, Yz))))).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(category_theory_axiom3, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2, Yz2]: (~product(Y2, Z2, Yz2) | (~defined(X2, Yz2) | defined(X2, Y2)))).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(category_theory_axiom6, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: (~defined(X2, Y2) | (~defined(Y2, Z2) | (~identity_map(Y2) | defined(X2, Z2))))).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(closure_of_composition, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: (~defined(X2, Y2) | product(X2, Y2, compose(X2, Y2)))).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(codomain_is_an_identity_map, axiom, ![X2]: identity_map(codomain(X2))).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(product_on_codomain, axiom, ![X2]: product(codomain(X2), X2, X2)).
% 0.20/0.51    fof(prove_a_bc_exists, negated_conjecture, ~defined(a, compose(b, c))).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.20/0.51  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.20/0.51  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.20/0.51    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.20/0.51    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.20/0.51  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.20/0.51  variables of u and v.
% 0.20/0.51  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.20/0.51  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 1 (assume_bc_exists): defined(b, c) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 2 (assume_ab_exists): defined(a, b) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 3 (codomain_is_an_identity_map): identity_map(codomain(X)) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 4 (product_on_codomain): product(codomain(X), X, X) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 5 (category_theory_axiom1): fresh27(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 6 (category_theory_axiom6): fresh19(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 7 (category_theory_axiom3): fresh11(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 8 (closure_of_composition): fresh7(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 9 (category_theory_axiom3): fresh12(X, X, Y, Z, W) = defined(W, Y).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 10 (category_theory_axiom6): fresh8(X, X, Y, Z, W) = defined(Y, W).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 11 (category_theory_axiom6): fresh18(X, X, Y, Z, W) = fresh19(defined(Y, Z), true, Y, W).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 12 (category_theory_axiom1): fresh14(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = defined(Y, V).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 13 (closure_of_composition): fresh7(defined(X, Y), true, X, Y) = product(X, Y, compose(X, Y)).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 14 (category_theory_axiom1): fresh26(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = fresh27(defined(W, V), true, Y, U).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 15 (category_theory_axiom6): fresh18(identity_map(X), true, Y, X, Z) = fresh8(defined(X, Z), true, Y, X, Z).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 16 (category_theory_axiom3): fresh12(product(X, Y, Z), true, X, Z, W) = fresh11(defined(W, Z), true, X, W).
% 0.20/0.51  Axiom 17 (category_theory_axiom1): fresh26(product(X, Y, Z), true, W, X, V, Y, Z) = fresh14(product(W, X, V), true, W, V, Y, Z).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Goal 1 (prove_a_bc_exists): defined(a, compose(b, c)) = true.
% 0.20/0.51  Proof:
% 0.20/0.51    defined(a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 10 (category_theory_axiom6) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(true, true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 5 (category_theory_axiom1) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh27(true, true, codomain(b), compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 1 (assume_bc_exists) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh27(defined(b, c), true, codomain(b), compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 14 (category_theory_axiom1) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh26(true, true, codomain(b), b, b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 8 (closure_of_composition) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh26(fresh7(true, true, b, c), true, codomain(b), b, b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 1 (assume_bc_exists) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh26(fresh7(defined(b, c), true, b, c), true, codomain(b), b, b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 13 (closure_of_composition) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh26(product(b, c, compose(b, c)), true, codomain(b), b, b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 17 (category_theory_axiom1) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh14(product(codomain(b), b, b), true, codomain(b), b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (product_on_codomain) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(fresh14(true, true, codomain(b), b, c, compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 12 (category_theory_axiom1) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh8(defined(codomain(b), compose(b, c)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 15 (category_theory_axiom6) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh18(identity_map(codomain(b)), true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 3 (codomain_is_an_identity_map) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh18(true, true, a, codomain(b), compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 11 (category_theory_axiom6) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(defined(a, codomain(b)), true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 9 (category_theory_axiom3) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(fresh12(true, true, codomain(b), b, a), true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (product_on_codomain) R->L }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(fresh12(product(codomain(b), b, b), true, codomain(b), b, a), true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 16 (category_theory_axiom3) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(fresh11(defined(a, b), true, codomain(b), a), true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 2 (assume_ab_exists) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(fresh11(true, true, codomain(b), a), true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 7 (category_theory_axiom3) }
% 0.20/0.51    fresh19(true, true, a, compose(b, c))
% 0.20/0.51  = { by axiom 6 (category_theory_axiom6) }
% 0.20/0.51    true
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------