TSTP Solution File: CAT014-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : CAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:50:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  14   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f38,f11]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] : identity_map(codomain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',codomain_is_an_identity_map) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ~ identity_map(codomain(a)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f13]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0] : defined(codomain(X0),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mapping_from_codomain_of_x_to_x) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( ~ defined(codomain(codomain(a)),codomain(a))
    | ~ identity_map(codomain(a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f30,f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ defined(X0,X1)
      | ~ identity_map(X1)
      | product(X0,X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity2) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ~ product(codomain(codomain(a)),codomain(a),codomain(codomain(a))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f24,f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : product(codomain(X0),X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_on_codomain) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,codomain(a))
      | ~ product(X0,X1,codomain(codomain(a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X6] :
      ( sQ0_eqProxy(X2,X6)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X6) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f18,f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
    <=> X0 = X1 ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ0_eqProxy])]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X6] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X6)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
      | X2 = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_is_well_defined) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ sQ0_eqProxy(codomain(a),codomain(codomain(a))),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f19,f20]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    codomain(a) != codomain(codomain(a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_is_idempotent) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:20:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.45  % (5145)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  % (5138)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Time elapsed: 0.052 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5138)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Time elapsed: 0.052 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5145)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (5121)Success in time 0.118 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------