TSTP Solution File: CAT013-4 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : CAT013-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:04:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.77s 9.78s
% Output : Proof 9.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CAT013-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 19:49:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 9.77/9.78 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.77/9.78 % SZS output start Proof
% 9.77/9.78 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 equivalent(X, Y) ==> there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 equivalent(X, Y) ==> X = Y
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(X) & X = Y ==> equivalent(X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(domain(X)) ==> there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(codomain(X)) ==> there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(compose(X, Y)) ==> there_exists(domain(X))
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(compose(X, Y)) ==> domain(X) = codomain(Y)
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(domain(X)) & domain(X) = codomain(Y) ==> there_exists(compose(X, Y))
% 9.77/9.78 compose(X, compose(Y, Z)) = compose(compose(X, Y), Z)
% 9.77/9.78 compose(X, domain(X)) = X
% 9.77/9.78 compose(codomain(X), X) = X
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(codomain(a))
% 9.77/9.78 domain(codomain(a)) = codomain(a) ==> \bottom
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 This holds because
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 E:
% 9.77/9.78 compose(X, compose(Y, Z)) = compose(compose(X, Y), Z)
% 9.77/9.78 compose(X, domain(X)) = X
% 9.77/9.78 compose(codomain(X), X) = X
% 9.77/9.78 f1(equivalent(X, Y), X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f1(true__, X) = there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 f10(codomain(Y), Y, X) = f9(there_exists(domain(X)), X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f10(domain(X), Y, X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(codomain(a)) = false__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(domain(codomain(a))) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f2(equivalent(X, Y), X, Y) = Y
% 9.77/9.78 f2(true__, X, Y) = X
% 9.77/9.78 f3(true__, X, Y) = equivalent(X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f4(X, Y, X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f4(Y, Y, X) = f3(there_exists(X), X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f5(there_exists(domain(X)), X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, X) = there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 f6(there_exists(codomain(X)), X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(true__, X) = there_exists(X)
% 9.77/9.78 f7(there_exists(compose(X, Y)), X) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(true__, X) = there_exists(domain(X))
% 9.77/9.78 f8(there_exists(compose(X, Y)), X, Y) = codomain(Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f8(true__, X, Y) = domain(X)
% 9.77/9.78 f9(true__, X, Y) = there_exists(compose(X, Y))
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(codomain(a)) = true__
% 9.77/9.78 G:
% 9.77/9.78 true__ = false__
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 This holds because
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 f8(f5(true__, compose(X, Y)), X, Y) = codomain(Y)
% 9.77/9.78 codomain(domain(Y0)) -> f8(f5(true__, Y0), Y0, domain(Y0))
% 9.77/9.78 compose(X, domain(X)) -> X
% 9.77/9.78 compose(Y0, compose(Y1, domain(compose(Y0, Y1)))) -> compose(Y0, Y1)
% 9.77/9.78 compose(Y0, compose(domain(Y0), Y2)) -> compose(Y0, Y2)
% 9.77/9.78 compose(codomain(X), X) -> X
% 9.77/9.78 compose(compose(X, Y), Z) -> compose(X, compose(Y, Z))
% 9.77/9.78 compose(f8(f5(true__, compose(X1, Y0)), X1, Y0), Y0) -> Y0
% 9.77/9.78 compose(f8(f5(true__, compose(true__, Y1)), true__, Y1), compose(Y1, Y2)) -> compose(Y1, Y2)
% 9.77/9.78 domain(f8(f6(true__, compose(false__, a)), false__, a)) -> f8(f5(true__, compose(false__, a)), false__, a)
% 9.77/9.78 equivalent(X, Y) -> f3(true__, X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f1(equivalent(X, Y), X) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f1(true__, X) -> f5(true__, X)
% 9.77/9.78 f1(true__, codomain(a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f10(codomain(Y), Y, X) -> f9(f5(true__, domain(X)), X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f10(domain(X), Y, X) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(codomain(a)) -> false__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(domain(codomain(a))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(domain(f8(f5(true__, compose(X1, a)), X1, a))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f11(f8(f5(true__, compose(X1, a)), X1, a)) -> false__
% 9.77/9.78 f2(equivalent(X, Y), X, Y) -> Y
% 9.77/9.78 f2(true__, X, Y) -> X
% 9.77/9.78 f3(f5(true__, Y1), Y1, Y1) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f3(true__, a, a) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f3(true__, domain(a), domain(a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f3(true__, f8(f6(true__, compose(false__, a)), false__, a), f8(f6(true__, compose(false__, a)), false__, a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f4(X, Y, X) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f4(Y, Y, X) -> f3(f5(true__, X), X, Y)
% 9.77/9.78 f5(f5(true__, domain(Y0)), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, a) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, domain(a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, domain(domain(a))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, domain(domain(domain(a)))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, domain(f8(f5(true__, compose(true__, a)), true__, a))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f5(true__, f8(f5(true__, compose(X1, a)), X1, a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(f1(true__, codomain(Y0)), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(f5(true__, f8(f5(true__, compose(true__, Y0)), true__, Y0)), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(f6(true__, codomain(Y0)), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(there_exists(codomain(X)), X) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(true__, X) -> f5(true__, X)
% 9.77/9.78 f6(true__, codomain(a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f6(true__, domain(domain(domain(a)))) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(f1(true__, Y1), codomain(Y1)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(f5(true__, Y0), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(f5(true__, Y1), f8(f5(true__, compose(true__, Y1)), true__, Y1)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(f5(true__, compose(Y0, Y1)), Y0) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(f6(true__, Y1), codomain(Y1)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 f7(true__, X) -> f5(true__, domain(X))
% 9.77/9.78 f8(f6(true__, Y1), codomain(Y1), Y1) -> codomain(Y1)
% 9.77/9.78 f8(true__, X, Y) -> domain(X)
% 9.77/9.78 f9(true__, X, Y) -> f5(true__, compose(X, Y))
% 9.77/9.78 false__ -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(X) -> f5(true__, X)
% 9.77/9.78 there_exists(codomain(a)) -> true__
% 9.77/9.78 with the LPO induced by
% 9.77/9.78 f7 > f10 > f4 > f9 > codomain > f8 > domain > f6 > f1 > there_exists > f5 > f2 > f11 > equivalent > f3 > compose > a > false__ > true__
% 9.77/9.78
% 9.77/9.78 % SZS output end Proof
% 9.77/9.78
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------