TSTP Solution File: CAT013-3 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : CAT013-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:06:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CAT013-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun May 29 23:57:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.76/1.06  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.76/1.06  Process 27897 was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.76/1.06  Sun May 29 23:57:43 2022
% 0.76/1.06  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_27693_n023.cluster.edu".
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27693_n023.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.76/1.06  set(auto2).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.76/1.06      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.76/1.06      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.76/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.06  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.76/1.06  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.76/1.06  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.76/1.06  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.76/1.06  clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.76/1.06  1 -there_exists(A) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  2 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(A) # label(equivalence_implies_existence1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  3 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(B) # label(equivalence_implies_existence3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  4 -equivalent(A,B) | A = B # label(equivalence_implies_existence2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  Derived: -there_exists(A) | A != B | there_exists(B).  [resolve(1,c,3,a)].
% 0.76/1.06  5 -there_exists(A) | -there_exists(B) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.76/1.06  Function symbol KB weights:  a=1. compose=1. f1=1. codomain=1. domain=1.
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.76/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.76/1.06  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.76/1.06  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.76/1.06  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.76/1.06  % Given clauses 67.
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  6 there_exists(codomain(a)) # label(assume_codomain_exists) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  8 compose(codomain(A),A) = A # label(compose_codomain) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  14 domain(codomain(a)) != codomain(a) # label(prove_domain_of_codomain_is_codomain) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  16 -there_exists(codomain(A)) | there_exists(A) # label(codomain_has_elements) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  19 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | domain(A) = codomain(B) # label(domain_codomain_composition1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.06  20 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | codomain(B) = domain(A).  [copy(19),flip(b)].
% 0.76/1.06  26 domain(codomain(a)) = c_0.  [new_symbol(14)].
% 0.76/1.06  27 codomain(a) != c_0.  [back_rewrite(14),rewrite([26(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.76/1.06  33 there_exists(a).  [resolve(16,a,6,a)].
% 0.76/1.06  41 -there_exists(A) | domain(codomain(A)) = codomain(A).  [para(8(a,1),20(a,1)),flip(b)].
% 0.76/1.06  283 $F.  [resolve(41,a,33,a),rewrite([26(3)]),flip(a),unit_del(a,27)].
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  Given=67. Generated=594. Kept=272. proofs=1.
% 0.76/1.06  Usable=46. Sos=94. Demods=38. Limbo=8, Disabled=144. Hints=0.
% 0.76/1.06  Megabytes=0.21.
% 0.76/1.06  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.76/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.76/1.06  
% 0.76/1.06  Process 27897 exit (max_proofs) Sun May 29 23:57:43 2022
% 0.76/1.06  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------