TSTP Solution File: CAT013-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CAT013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.61s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : CAT013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun May 29 21:54:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Sun May 29 21:54:58 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1307.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.37  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,20,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.42  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.42  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses in intial UL: 13
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses initially in problem: 20
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 65
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.42  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.42  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.20/0.42     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.42     distinct function count: 3
% 0.20/0.42     distinct constant count: 1
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 4 [ 1 1 90 ] (0.00 seconds, 232740 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 5 [ 1 1 220 ] (0.00 seconds, 83169 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 6 [ 1 1 6946 ] (0.00 seconds, 27480 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 7 [ 1 1 25634 ] (0.00 seconds, 43162 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 8 [ 2 1 6920 ] (0.00 seconds, 46714 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.22 sec ----> 45 [binary,43.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  10 [] {+} -defined(A,B)| -identity_map(A)|product(A,B,B).
% 0.37/0.61  12 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 0.37/0.61  13 [] {+} domain(codomain(a))!=codomain(a).
% 0.37/0.61  15 [] {+} identity_map(codomain(A)).
% 0.37/0.61  16 [] {+} defined(A,domain(A)).
% 0.37/0.61  18 [] {+} product(A,domain(A),A).
% 0.37/0.61  23 [hyper,16,10,15] {+} product(codomain(A),domain(codomain(A)),domain(codomain(A))).
% 0.37/0.61  43 [hyper,23,12,18,flip.1] {-} domain(codomain(A))=codomain(A).
% 0.37/0.61  45 [binary,43.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.61  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  ============ end of search ============
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  true clauses given           1      (12.5%)
% 0.37/0.61  false clauses given          7
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.37/0.61     5  3         3
% 0.37/0.61     6  1         1
% 0.37/0.61     7  1         1
% 0.37/0.61     8  0         2
% 0.37/0.61     9  2         1
% 0.37/0.61    11  1         1
% 0.37/0.61    12  0         2
% 0.37/0.61    13  1         1
% 0.37/0.61  tot:  9         12      (57.1% true)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Model 8 [ 2 1 6920 ] (0.00 seconds, 46714 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.37/0.61  
% 0.37/0.61  Process 1307 finished Sun May 29 21:54:58 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------