TSTP Solution File: CAT012-4 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : CAT012-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:51:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 43 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 16 ~; 13 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f71,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f28,f30,f64,f70]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
~ spl2_5,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f69]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl2_5 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
( sF0 != sF0
| ~ spl2_5 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f17,f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
( sF1 = sF0
| ~ spl2_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
( spl2_5
<=> sF1 = sF0 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_5])]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
sF1 != sF0,
inference(definition_folding,[],[f13,f16,f15,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
domain(a) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
codomain(sF0) = sF1,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
domain(a) != codomain(domain(a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_domain_is_domain) ).
fof(f64,plain,
( spl2_5
| ~ spl2_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f59,f21,f61]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl2_1
<=> there_exists(a) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
( ~ there_exists(a)
| sF1 = sF0 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f58,f15]) ).
fof(f58,plain,
( domain(a) = sF1
| ~ there_exists(a) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f50,f16]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
( domain(a) = codomain(sF0)
| ~ there_exists(a) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f7,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
a = compose(a,sF0),
inference(superposition,[],[f10,f15]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0] : compose(X0,domain(X0)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compose_domain) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
| domain(X0) = codomain(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_codomain_composition1) ).
fof(f30,plain,
spl2_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( $false
| spl2_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f27,f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
there_exists(sF0),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f12,f15]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
there_exists(domain(a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assume_domain_exists) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( ~ there_exists(sF0)
| spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( spl2_2
<=> there_exists(sF0) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
( spl2_1
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f25,f21]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( ~ there_exists(sF0)
| there_exists(a) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f15]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ there_exists(domain(X0))
| there_exists(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_has_elements) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CAT012-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 16:14:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 % (12833)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (12835)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (12834)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (12824)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (12833)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50 % (12850)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (12834)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Time elapsed: 0.106 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (12833)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (12816)Success in time 0.16 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------