TSTP Solution File: CAT011-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : CAT011-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:59:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CAT011-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 00:45:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 18 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36 # We now have 18 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X1))=domain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (domain(codomain(X1))=codomain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (compose(domain(X1),X1)=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (compose(X1,codomain(X1))=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (domain(domain(a))!=domain(a))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (domain(compose(X1,X2))=domain(X1)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (codomain(compose(X1,X2))=codomain(X2)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (compose(compose(X1,X2),X3)=compose(X1,compose(X2,X3))|codomain(X2)!=domain(X3)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X7))=domain(X7)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (codomain(domain(X7))=domain(X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (codomain(domain(domain(X7)))!=domain(domain(X7))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (compose(codomain(domain(domain(X7))),codomain(domain(X7)))=compose(domain(domain(X7)),domain(X7))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (compose(domain(domain(X7)),domain(X7))!=domain(X7)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (compose(codomain(domain(domain(X7))),codomain(domain(X7)))=domain(X7)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X1))=domain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (domain(codomain(X1))=codomain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (compose(domain(X1),X1)=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (compose(X1,codomain(X1))=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (domain(domain(a))!=domain(a))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (domain(compose(X1,X2))=domain(X1)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (codomain(compose(X1,X2))=codomain(X2)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (compose(compose(X1,X2),X3)=compose(X1,compose(X2,X3))|codomain(X2)!=domain(X3)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X4))=domain(X4)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (codomain(domain(X4))=domain(X4)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (codomain(codomain(domain(X4)))=codomain(domain(X4))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (codomain(domain(X4))!=domain(X4)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (codomain(codomain(domain(X4)))=domain(X4)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X1))=domain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (domain(codomain(X1))=codomain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (compose(domain(X1),X1)=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (compose(X1,codomain(X1))=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (domain(domain(a))!=domain(a))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (domain(compose(X1,X2))=domain(X1)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (codomain(compose(X1,X2))=codomain(X2)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (compose(compose(X1,X2),X3)=compose(X1,compose(X2,X3))|codomain(X2)!=domain(X3)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X6))=domain(X6)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (codomain(domain(X6))=domain(X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (domain(codomain(domain(X6)))=domain(domain(X6))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (domain(domain(X6))!=codomain(domain(domain(X6)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (domain(codomain(domain(X6)))=codomain(domain(domain(X6)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(X1))=domain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (domain(codomain(X1))=codomain(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (compose(domain(X1),X1)=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (compose(X1,codomain(X1))=X1)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (domain(domain(a))!=domain(a))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (domain(compose(X1,X2))=domain(X1)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (codomain(compose(X1,X2))=codomain(X2)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (compose(compose(X1,X2),X3)=compose(X1,compose(X2,X3))|codomain(X2)!=domain(X3)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (codomain(domain(a))=domain(a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (codomain(domain(a))=domain(a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (domain(domain(a))=domain(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (domain(domain(a))!=codomain(domain(a))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (domain(domain(a))!=codomain(domain(domain(a)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (codomain(domain(domain(a)))!=codomain(domain(a))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # Child (9451) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.36 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------