TSTP Solution File: CAT011-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : CAT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:04:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 275.70s 275.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 275.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   63 (  32 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(closure_of_composition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X,Y)
    | product(X,Y,compose(X,Y)) ) ).

cnf(domain_is_an_identity_map,axiom,
    identity_map(domain(X)) ).

cnf(mapping_from_x_to_its_domain,axiom,
    defined(X,domain(X)) ).

cnf(product_on_domain,axiom,
    product(X,domain(X),X) ).

cnf(identity1,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X,Y)
    | ~ identity_map(X)
    | product(X,Y,Y) ) ).

cnf(composition_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(X,Y,W)
    | Z = W ) ).

cnf(prove_domain_is_idempotent,negated_conjecture,
    domain(domain(a)) != domain(a) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    defined(X_13,domain(X_13)),
    inference(subst,[],[mapping_from_x_to_its_domain:[bind(X,$fot(X_13))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X_13,domain(X_13))
    | ~ identity_map(X_13)
    | product(X_13,domain(X_13),domain(X_13)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[identity1:[bind(X,$fot(X_13)),bind(Y,$fot(domain(X_13)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ identity_map(X_13)
    | product(X_13,domain(X_13),domain(X_13)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( defined(X_13,domain(X_13)) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ identity_map(domain(X))
    | product(domain(X),domain(domain(X)),domain(domain(X))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(X_13,$fot(domain(X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    product(domain(X),domain(domain(X)),domain(domain(X))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( identity_map(domain(X)) )],[domain_is_an_identity_map,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    defined(X_9,domain(X_9)),
    inference(subst,[],[mapping_from_x_to_its_domain:[bind(X,$fot(X_9))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X_9,domain(X_9))
    | product(X_9,domain(X_9),compose(X_9,domain(X_9))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[closure_of_composition:[bind(X,$fot(X_9)),bind(Y,$fot(domain(X_9)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    product(X_9,domain(X_9),compose(X_9,domain(X_9))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( defined(X_9,domain(X_9)) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    product(X_105654,domain(X_105654),compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_9,$fot(X_105654))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ product(X_105654,domain(X_105654),X_105656)
    | ~ product(X_105654,domain(X_105654),compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654)))
    | X_105656 = compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[composition_is_well_defined:[bind(W,$fot(compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654)))),bind(X,$fot(X_105654)),bind(Y,$fot(domain(X_105654))),bind(Z,$fot(X_105656))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ product(X_105654,domain(X_105654),X_105656)
    | X_105656 = compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( product(X_105654,domain(X_105654),compose(X_105654,domain(X_105654))) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ product(domain(X),domain(domain(X)),domain(domain(X)))
    | domain(domain(X)) = compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_10:[bind(X_105654,$fot(domain(X))),bind(X_105656,$fot(domain(domain(X))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    domain(domain(X)) = compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( product(domain(X),domain(domain(X)),domain(domain(X))) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    product(X_105950,domain(X_105950),X_105950),
    inference(subst,[],[product_on_domain:[bind(X,$fot(X_105950))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ product(X_105950,domain(X_105950),X_105950)
    | X_105950 = compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_10:[bind(X_105654,$fot(X_105950)),bind(X_105656,$fot(X_105950))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    X_105950 = compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( product(X_105950,domain(X_105950),X_105950) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( X_105950 != compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950))
    | compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950)) = X_105950 ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(X0,$fot(X_105950)),bind(Y0,$fot(compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950)) = X_105950,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X_105950,compose(X_105950,domain(X_105950))) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X))) = domain(X),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(X_105950,$fot(domain(X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X))) != domain(X)
    | domain(domain(X)) != compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X)))
    | domain(domain(X)) = domain(X) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(domain(domain(X)),compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X)))) ),[1],$fot(domain(X))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( domain(domain(X)) != compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X)))
    | domain(domain(X)) = domain(X) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X))),domain(X)) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_22]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    domain(domain(X)) = domain(X),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(domain(domain(X)),compose(domain(X),domain(domain(X)))) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_23]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    domain(domain(a)) = domain(a),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_24:[bind(X,$fot(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( domain(a) != domain(a)
    | domain(domain(a)) != domain(a)
    | domain(domain(a)) = domain(a) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(domain(domain(a)),domain(a)) ),[0,0],$fot(domain(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    ( domain(a) != domain(a)
    | domain(domain(a)) = domain(a) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(domain(domain(a)),domain(a)) )],[refute_0_25,refute_0_26]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    domain(a) != domain(a),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(domain(domain(a)),domain(a)) )],[refute_0_27,prove_domain_is_idempotent]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    domain(a) = domain(a),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(domain(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(domain(a),domain(a)) )],[refute_0_29,refute_0_28]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CAT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 22:27:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 275.70/275.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 275.70/275.99  
% 275.70/275.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 275.70/275.99  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------