TSTP Solution File: CAT010-10 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT010-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.93s 2.14s
% Output   : Refutation 1.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (  17 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
    ifeq2(X,X,Y,Z) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom_002,axiom,
    ifeq(X,X,Y,Z) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_002) ).

cnf(domain_has_elements,axiom,
    ifeq(there_exists(domain(X)),true,there_exists(X),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_has_elements) ).

cnf(composition_implies_domain,axiom,
    ifeq(there_exists(compose(X,Y)),true,there_exists(domain(X)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_implies_domain) ).

cnf(domain_codomain_composition1,axiom,
    ifeq2(there_exists(compose(X,Y)),true,domain(X),codomain(Y)) = codomain(Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_codomain_composition1) ).

cnf(associativity_of_compose,axiom,
    compose(X,compose(Y,Z)) = compose(compose(X,Y),Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_compose) ).

cnf(compose_codomain,axiom,
    compose(codomain(X),X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compose_codomain) ).

cnf(ab_exists,hypothesis,
    there_exists(compose(a,b)) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ab_exists) ).

cnf(prove_codomain_of_ab_equals_codomain_of_a,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(compose(a,b)) != codomain(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_ab_equals_codomain_of_a) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    compose(codomain(X),compose(X,Y)) = compose(X,Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[associativity_of_compose,compose_codomain,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    there_exists(domain(a)) = true,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[composition_implies_domain,ab_exists,theory(equality)]),ifeq_axiom_002,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    domain(a) = codomain(b),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[domain_codomain_composition1,ab_exists,theory(equality)]),ifeq_axiom_001,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    there_exists(codomain(b)) = true,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[30,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ifeq2(there_exists(X),true,domain(codomain(X)),codomain(X)) = codomain(X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[domain_codomain_composition1,compose_codomain,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    there_exists(a) = true,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[domain_has_elements,35,theory(equality)]),ifeq_axiom_002,36,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    ifeq2(there_exists(compose(X,Y)),true,domain(codomain(X)),codomain(compose(X,Y))) = codomain(compose(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[domain_codomain_composition1,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(202,plain,
    domain(codomain(a)) = codomain(a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[37,46,theory(equality)]),ifeq_axiom_001,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2664,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[84,ab_exists,theory(equality)]),prove_codomain_of_ab_equals_codomain_of_a,ifeq_axiom_001,202,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : CAT010-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Sun May 29 22:17:12 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38  * 
% 0.14/0.38  * 
% 0.14/0.39  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.39  * 
% 0.14/0.39  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.39  * 
% 0.14/0.39  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.39   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.39   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.39   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.39   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.39   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.39  * 
% 0.14/0.39  "."
% 0.14/0.39  * 
% 0.14/0.39  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T22:17:12
% 0.14/0.39  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T22:17:12
% 0.14/0.40  
% 1.93/2.14  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|compose| ?X (|compose| ?Y ?Z)) (|compose| (|compose| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 1.93/2.14  
% 1.93/2.14  #||
% 1.93/2.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.93/2.14  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.93/2.15  ||#
% 1.93/2.15  
% 1.93/2.15  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.93/2.15  ;      9841 formulas have been input or derived (from 196 formulas).
% 1.93/2.15  ;      2664 (27%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.93/2.15  ;          211 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.93/2.15  ;         2453 (92%) are still being kept.
% 1.93/2.15  ; 
% 1.93/2.15  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (16 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.268  15%   Process new row              (9,287 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.008   0%   Resolution                   (390 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.119   7%   Paramodulation               (195 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.467  27%   Forward simplification       (9,272 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.124   7%   Backward simplification      (2,664 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.726  41%   Ordering                     (109,056 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.93/2.15  ;     0.042   2%   Other
% 1.93/2.15  ;     1.756        Total
% 1.93/2.15  ;     1.757        Real time
% 1.93/2.15  ; 
% 1.93/2.15  ; Term-hash-array has 7,202 terms in all.
% 1.93/2.15  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Path-index has 6,737 entries (6,737 at peak, 7,210 added, 473 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Path-index has 13,172 nodes (13,172 at peak, 13,762 added, 590 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Trie-index has 6,737 entries (6,737 at peak, 7,210 added, 473 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Trie-index has 42,597 nodes (42,597 at peak, 45,287 added, 2,690 deleted).
% 1.93/2.15  ; Retrieved 73,181 generalization terms in 90,141 calls.
% 1.93/2.15  ; Retrieved 9,847 instance terms in 3,547 calls.
% 1.93/2.15  ; Retrieved 19,268 unifiable terms in 1,592 calls.
% 1.93/2.15  ; 
% 1.93/2.15  ; The agenda of rows to process has 73 entries:
% 1.93/2.15  ;     1 with value 23              5 with value 30               5 with value 36
% 1.93/2.15  ;     2 with value 25              3 with value 31               1 with value 37
% 1.93/2.15  ;     5 with value 26              7 with value 32               1 with value 38
% 1.93/2.15  ;     4 with value 27              6 with value 33               8 with value 39
% 1.93/2.15  ;     2 with value 28              5 with value 34               2 with value 41
% 1.93/2.15  ;     5 with value 29              5 with value 35               6 with value 43
% 1.93/2.15  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2280 entries:
% 1.93/2.15  ;    36 with value (4 24)        205 with value (4 33)          41 with value (4 42)
% 1.93/2.15  ;    49 with value (4 25)        182 with value (4 34)           4 with value (4 43)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   116 with value (4 26)        124 with value (4 35)           4 with value (4 44)
% 1.93/2.15  ;    75 with value (4 27)        104 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 45)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   107 with value (4 28)        147 with value (4 37)           5 with value (4 46)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   135 with value (4 29)        116 with value (4 38)           3 with value (4 47)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   164 with value (4 30)         37 with value (4 39)           1 with value (4 49)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   306 with value (4 31)         32 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 50)
% 1.93/2.15  ;   250 with value (4 32)         32 with value (4 41)
% 1.93/2.15  Evaluation took:
% 1.93/2.15    1.758 seconds of real time
% 1.93/2.15    1.58499 seconds of user run time
% 1.93/2.15    0.173013 seconds of system run time
% 1.93/2.15    [Run times include 0.145 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.93/2.15    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.93/2.15    0 page faults and
% 1.93/2.15    129,618,416 bytes consed.
% 1.93/2.15  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.93/2.15  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T22:17:13
% 1.93/2.15  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.93/2.15  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------