TSTP Solution File: CAT009-3 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : CAT009-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:51:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  17   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f281,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f71,f109,f280]) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    ~ spl3_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f279]) ).

fof(f279,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f278,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    sF1 != sF2,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f19,f24,f23,f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    compose(a,b) = sF0,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    sF1 = domain(sF0),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    domain(b) = sF2,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    domain(compose(a,b)) != domain(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_domain_of_ab_equals_domain_of_b) ).

fof(f278,plain,
    ( sF1 = sF2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f277,f23]) ).

fof(f277,plain,
    ( domain(sF0) = sF2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f276,f70]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( codomain(sF2) = sF2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> codomain(sF2) = sF2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

fof(f276,plain,
    domain(sF0) = codomain(sF2),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f273,f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    there_exists(sF0),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f18,f22]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    there_exists(compose(a,b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ab_exists) ).

fof(f273,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(sF0)
    | domain(sF0) = codomain(sF2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f205]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    compose(sF0,sF2) = sF0,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f204,f22]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    compose(a,b) = compose(sF0,sF2),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f199,f24]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    compose(a,b) = compose(sF0,domain(b)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f77,f10]) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : compose(X0,domain(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compose_domain) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X8] : compose(a,compose(b,X8)) = compose(sF0,X8),
    inference(superposition,[],[f9,f22]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : compose(X0,compose(X1,X2)) = compose(compose(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_compose) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
      | domain(X0) = codomain(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_codomain_composition1) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f108,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> there_exists(b) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    there_exists(b),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f104,f50]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    there_exists(domain(a)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f46,f27]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(sF0)
    | there_exists(domain(a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f6,f22]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
      | there_exists(domain(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_implies_domain) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( there_exists(b)
    | ~ there_exists(domain(a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    domain(a) = codomain(b),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f62,f27]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(sF0)
    | domain(a) = codomain(b) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f22]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ there_exists(codomain(X0))
      | there_exists(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',codomain_has_elements) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f66,f31,f68]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(b)
    | codomain(sF2) = sF2 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f63,f24]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(b)
    | domain(b) = codomain(sF2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    b = compose(b,sF2),
    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CAT009-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:29:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  % (8017)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (8001)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (8017)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Time elapsed: 0.085 s
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (8017)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (7992)Success in time 0.152 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------