TSTP Solution File: CAT009-3 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : CAT009-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:06:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CAT009-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 20:27:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.73/1.06  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.73/1.06  Process 27287 was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.73/1.06  Sun May 29 20:27:19 2022
% 0.73/1.06  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_27133_n028.cluster.edu".
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27133_n028.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.73/1.06  set(auto2).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.73/1.06      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.73/1.06      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.73/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.06  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.73/1.06  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.73/1.06  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.73/1.06  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.73/1.06  clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.73/1.06  1 -there_exists(A) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  2 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(A) # label(equivalence_implies_existence1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  3 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(B) # label(equivalence_implies_existence3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  4 -equivalent(A,B) | A = B # label(equivalence_implies_existence2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  Derived: -there_exists(A) | A != B | there_exists(B).  [resolve(1,c,3,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  5 -there_exists(A) | -there_exists(B) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.73/1.06  Function symbol KB weights:  a=1. b=1. compose=1. f1=1. domain=1. codomain=1.
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.73/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % Proof 1 at 0.08 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.73/1.06  % Length of proof is 31.
% 0.73/1.06  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.73/1.06  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.73/1.06  % Given clauses 143.
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  6 there_exists(compose(a,b)) # label(ab_exists) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  7 compose(A,domain(A)) = A # label(compose_domain) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  8 compose(codomain(A),A) = A # label(compose_codomain) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  10 compose(A,compose(B,C)) = compose(compose(A,B),C) # label(associativity_of_compose) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  11 compose(compose(A,B),C) = compose(A,compose(B,C)).  [copy(10),flip(a)].
% 0.73/1.06  14 domain(compose(a,b)) != domain(b) # label(prove_domain_of_ab_equals_domain_of_b) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  16 -there_exists(codomain(A)) | there_exists(A) # label(codomain_has_elements) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  17 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | there_exists(domain(A)) # label(composition_implies_domain) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  19 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | domain(A) = codomain(B) # label(domain_codomain_composition1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  20 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | codomain(B) = domain(A).  [copy(19),flip(b)].
% 0.73/1.06  21 -there_exists(domain(A)) | domain(A) != codomain(B) | there_exists(compose(A,B)) # label(domain_codomain_composition2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06  22 -there_exists(domain(A)) | codomain(B) != domain(A) | there_exists(compose(A,B)).  [copy(21),flip(b)].
% 0.73/1.06  26 compose(A,compose(B,domain(compose(A,B)))) = compose(A,B).  [para(11(a,1),7(a,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  28 compose(codomain(A),compose(A,B)) = compose(A,B).  [para(8(a,1),11(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.73/1.06  31 there_exists(domain(a)).  [resolve(17,a,6,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  32 -there_exists(A) | there_exists(domain(A)).  [para(7(a,1),17(a,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  39 codomain(b) = domain(a).  [resolve(20,a,6,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  40 -there_exists(A) | codomain(domain(A)) = domain(A).  [para(7(a,1),20(a,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  48 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | codomain(compose(B,domain(compose(A,B)))) = domain(A).  [para(26(a,1),20(a,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  55 there_exists(domain(domain(a))).  [resolve(32,a,31,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  65 there_exists(domain(domain(domain(a)))).  [resolve(55,a,32,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  86 compose(domain(a),b) = b.  [para(39(a,1),8(a,1,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  87 there_exists(b).  [para(39(a,1),16(a,1)),unit_del(a,31)].
% 0.73/1.06  88 compose(domain(a),compose(b,A)) = compose(b,A).  [para(39(a,1),28(a,1,1))].
% 0.73/1.06  132 codomain(A) != domain(domain(domain(a))) | there_exists(compose(domain(domain(a)),A)).  [resolve(65,a,22,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  219 domain(domain(a)) = domain(a).  [para(86(a,1),20(a,1)),rewrite([39(4)]),flip(b),unit_del(a,87)].
% 0.73/1.06  223 codomain(A) != domain(a) | there_exists(compose(domain(a),A)).  [back_rewrite(132),rewrite([219(4),219(4),219(7)])].
% 0.73/1.06  260 codomain(domain(compose(a,b))) = domain(compose(a,b)).  [resolve(40,a,6,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  420 codomain(compose(b,domain(compose(a,b)))) = domain(a).  [resolve(48,a,6,a)].
% 0.73/1.06  829 there_exists(compose(b,domain(compose(a,b)))).  [resolve(420,a,223,a),rewrite([88(9)])].
% 0.73/1.06  842 $F.  [resolve(829,a,20,a),rewrite([260(5)]),unit_del(a,14)].
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  Given=143. Generated=2451. Kept=831. proofs=1.
% 0.73/1.06  Usable=116. Sos=529. Demods=99. Limbo=9, Disabled=197. Hints=0.
% 0.73/1.06  Megabytes=0.76.
% 0.73/1.06  User_CPU=0.08, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.73/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.73/1.06  
% 0.73/1.06  Process 27287 exit (max_proofs) Sun May 29 20:27:19 2022
% 0.73/1.06  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------