TSTP Solution File: CAT006-3 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : CAT006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:50:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   8   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f74,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f73,f21]) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    d != codomain(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_a_is_d) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    d = codomain(a),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f72,f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    d = domain(d),
    inference(resolution,[],[f39,f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(d)
    | d = domain(d) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f20,f10]) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : compose(X0,domain(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compose_domain) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(d,X0))
      | compose(d,X0) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dx_equals_x) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    there_exists(d),
    inference(resolution,[],[f38,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ there_exists(domain(X0))
      | there_exists(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_has_elements) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    there_exists(domain(d)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    there_exists(a),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f18,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    a = compose(d,a),
    inference(resolution,[],[f20,f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    there_exists(compose(d,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',da_exists) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( ~ there_exists(a)
    | there_exists(domain(d)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f6,f25]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
      | there_exists(domain(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_implies_domain) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    codomain(a) = domain(d),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f68,f26]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( codomain(a) = domain(d)
    | ~ there_exists(a) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f25]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
      | domain(X0) = codomain(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain_codomain_composition1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CAT006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:17:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.52  % (1185)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.52  % (1185)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.52  % (1185)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (1185)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  % (1185)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Time elapsed: 0.041 s
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  % (1174)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  % (1158)Success in time 0.18 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------