TSTP Solution File: CAT006-3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   5 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(codomain_has_elements,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(codomain(X))
    | there_exists(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT003-0.ax',codomain_has_elements) ).

cnf(domain_codomain_composition1,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
    | domain(X) = codomain(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT003-0.ax',domain_codomain_composition1) ).

cnf(compose_domain,axiom,
    compose(X,domain(X)) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT003-0.ax',compose_domain) ).

cnf(composition_implies_codomain,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
    | there_exists(codomain(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT003-0.ax',composition_implies_codomain) ).

cnf(da_exists,hypothesis,
    there_exists(compose(d,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',da_exists) ).

cnf(dx_equals_x,hypothesis,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(d,X))
    | compose(d,X) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dx_equals_x) ).

cnf(prove_codomain_of_a_is_d,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(a) != d,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_a_is_d) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    there_exists(codomain(d)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[composition_implies_codomain,da_exists]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    domain(d) = codomain(a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[domain_codomain_composition1,da_exists]) ).

cnf(41,plain,
    ~ there_exists(d),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[dx_equals_x,compose_domain,theory(equality)]),prove_codomain_of_a_is_d,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[codomain_has_elements,41]),30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : CAT006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 17:55:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T17:55:58
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T17:55:58
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.51  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|compose| ?X (|compose| ?Y ?Z)) (|compose| (|compose| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  #||
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  ||#
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.51  ;       106 formulas have been input or derived (from 23 formulas).
% 0.19/0.51  ;        69 (65%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.51  ;            6 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.51  ;           63 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.004   9%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Assert                       (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.008  19%   Process new row              (96 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.002   5%   Resolution                   (44 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Paramodulation               (22 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (2 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (43 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Forward subsumption          (43 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (39 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (56 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Forward simplification       (96 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.002   5%   Backward simplification      (69 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.002   5%   Ordering                     (198 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.021  49%   Other
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.043        Total
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.045        Real time
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; Term-hash-array has 123 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 38 entries (38 at peak, 39 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 98 nodes (98 at peak, 107 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ;  Retrieved 43 possibly forward subsuming rows in 43 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ;  Retrieved 13 possibly backward subsumed rows in 39 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Path-index has 119 entries (120 at peak, 125 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Path-index has 283 nodes (285 at peak, 292 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Trie-index has 119 entries (120 at peak, 125 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Trie-index has 318 nodes (322 at peak, 334 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 78 generalization terms in 241 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 44 instance terms in 41 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 543 unifiable terms in 140 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     1 with value 7
% 0.19/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to give has 41 entries:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 5)           2 with value (4 13)           4 with value (4 19)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     4 with value (4 6)           3 with value (4 14)           7 with value (4 20)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     2 with value (4 8)           6 with value (4 15)           2 with value (4 22)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     4 with value (4 9)           2 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     2 with value (4 11)
% 0.19/0.51  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.51    0.045 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.51    0.043302 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.51    0.001847 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.51    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.51    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.51    2,534,000 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T17:55:58
% 0.19/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------