TSTP Solution File: CAT004-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.16YmDDFSCv true

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:20:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.13s 1.52s
% Output   : Refutation 6.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.16YmDDFSCv true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:21:40 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.12/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 6.13/1.52  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 6.13/1.52  % BCE start: 23
% 6.13/1.52  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 6.13/1.52  % PE start: 22
% 6.13/1.52  logic: eq
% 6.13/1.52  % PE eliminated: 3
% 6.13/1.52  % done 799 iterations in 0.763s
% 6.13/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 6.13/1.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.13/1.52  thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 6.13/1.52    (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 6.13/1.52     ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 6.13/1.52           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(h_ab_equals_g_ab, axiom,
% 6.13/1.52    (( compose @ h @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) =
% 6.13/1.52     ( compose @ g @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ))).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b)) = (compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ b)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [h_ab_equals_g_ab])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 6.13/1.52           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(cancellation_for_product2, axiom,
% 6.13/1.52    (( ( compose @ X @ b ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ Z @ b ) != ( Y ) ) | 
% 6.13/1.52     ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((compose @ X1 @ b) != (X0))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((compose @ X2 @ b) != (X0))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_product2])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl79, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ X1 @ b) != (compose @ X0 @ b)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl120, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((X2) = (compose @ X1 @ X0))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ X0 @ b)) != (compose @ X2 @ b)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl79])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl324, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((X0) = (compose @ g @ a))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (compose @ X0 @ b)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl120])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl622, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((compose @ X1 @ X0) = (compose @ g @ a))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 6.13/1.52              != (compose @ X1 @ (compose @ X0 @ b))))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl324])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8543, plain, (((compose @ h @ a) = (compose @ g @ a))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl622])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(cancellation_for_product1, axiom,
% 6.13/1.52    (( ( compose @ X @ a ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ Z @ a ) != ( Y ) ) | 
% 6.13/1.52     ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((compose @ X1 @ a) != (X0))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((compose @ X2 @ a) != (X0))
% 6.13/1.52          | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_product1])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl77, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 6.13/1.52         (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ X1 @ a) != (compose @ X0 @ a)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8589, plain,
% 6.13/1.52      (![X0 : $i]: (((X0) = (g)) | ((compose @ h @ a) != (compose @ X0 @ a)))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8543, zip_derived_cl77])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8650, plain, (((h) = (g))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8589])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(prove_h_equals_g, conjecture, (( h ) = ( g ))).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( h ) != ( g )),
% 6.13/1.52    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_h_equals_g])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, (((h) != (g))),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 6.13/1.52  thf(zip_derived_cl8651, plain, ($false),
% 6.13/1.52      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 6.13/1.52                [zip_derived_cl8650, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 6.13/1.52  
% 6.13/1.52  % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.13/1.52  
% 6.13/1.52  
% 6.13/1.52  % Terminating...
% 6.13/1.56  % Runner terminated.
% 6.15/1.58  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------