TSTP Solution File: CAT003-4 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : CAT003-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:50:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 5 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 11 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f39,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f38,f16]) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
h != g,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_g_equals_h) ).
fof(f38,plain,
h = g,
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X3] :
( compose(X3,compose(a,b)) != compose(h,compose(a,b))
| g = X3 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f17,f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X0] : compose(h,compose(a,X0)) = compose(g,compose(a,X0)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f18,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : compose(X0,compose(X1,X2)) = compose(compose(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_compose) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X0] : compose(g,compose(a,X0)) = compose(compose(h,a),X0),
inference(superposition,[],[f9,f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
compose(h,a) = compose(g,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ha_equals_ga) ).
fof(f17,plain,
! [X2,X0] :
( compose(X0,compose(a,b)) != compose(X2,compose(a,b))
| X0 = X2 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( compose(X2,compose(a,b)) != X1
| X0 = X2
| compose(X0,compose(a,b)) != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',epimorphism) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : CAT003-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 16:25:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 % (4985)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.48 % (4993)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Time elapsed: 0.077 s
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 % (4985)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 % (4977)Success in time 0.133 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------