TSTP Solution File: CAT003-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT003-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.otjAoPNlKv true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:20:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : CAT003-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.otjAoPNlKv true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:26:48 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.21/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.21/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.18/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.18/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.37/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.37/0.79 % BCE start: 22
% 1.37/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 1.37/0.79 % PE start: 21
% 1.37/0.79 logic: eq
% 1.37/0.79 % PE eliminated: 3
% 1.37/0.79 % done 60 iterations in 0.024s
% 1.37/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.37/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/0.79 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(ha_equals_ga, axiom, (( compose @ h @ a ) = ( compose @ g @ a ))).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (((compose @ h @ a) = (compose @ g @ a))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ha_equals_ga])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 1.37/0.79 (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 1.37/0.79 ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.37/0.79 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl104, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 ((compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ X0))
% 1.37/0.79 = (compose @ (compose @ h @ a) @ X0))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.37/0.79 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 ((compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ X0))
% 1.37/0.79 = (compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ X0)))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl104, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(epimorphism, axiom,
% 1.37/0.79 (( ( compose @ X @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 1.37/0.79 ( ( compose @ Z @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 (((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (X0))
% 1.37/0.79 | ((compose @ X2 @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (X0))
% 1.37/0.79 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [epimorphism])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl166, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 (((X0) = (X1))
% 1.37/0.79 | ((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 1.37/0.79 != (compose @ X0 @ (compose @ a @ b))))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl207, plain,
% 1.37/0.79 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.79 (((X0) = (g))
% 1.37/0.79 | ((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 1.37/0.79 != (compose @ X0 @ (compose @ a @ b))))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl106, zip_derived_cl166])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl221, plain, (((h) = (g))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl207])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(prove_g_equals_h, conjecture, (( g ) = ( h ))).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( g ) != ( h )),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_g_equals_h])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, (((g) != (h))),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.37/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl222, plain, ($false),
% 1.37/0.79 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.37/0.79 [zip_derived_cl221, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 1.37/0.79
% 1.37/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/0.79
% 1.37/0.79
% 1.37/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.62/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.62/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------