TSTP Solution File: CAT002-4 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : CAT002-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:03:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.66s 1.85s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CAT002-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 17:29:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 11.66/1.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.66/1.85 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 h != g).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c1, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 h != g,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 X0 = X1 | compose(b,X0) != compose(b,X1)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 g = X1).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c3, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c4, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) != compose(b,X1),
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c5, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X0 != X2 | h != X2,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X0 = X2).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c6, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 h != X2,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 h = X2).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c7, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c6])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 X3 = X4 | compose(a,X3) != compose(a,X4)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X1) = X3).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c9, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c10, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(a,X3) != compose(a,X4),
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c11, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X4 != X5 | compose(b,X0) != X5,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X4 = X5).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c12, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) != X5,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c11])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) = X5).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c13, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c12])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c14, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(X6,compose(X7,X8)) = compose(compose(X6,X7),X8)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(a,X3) = compose(X6,compose(X7,X8))).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c15, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c16, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c17, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X9 != compose(compose(X6,X7),X8) | X9 != compose(a,X4),
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c18, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(a,b),g)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(X6,X7),X8) = compose(compose(a,b),g)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c19, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X9 != compose(a,X4),
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c20, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c21, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X10 != compose(compose(a,b),h) | X9 != X10,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c22, axiom,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c23, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X9 != X10,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c24, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c25, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X14 != compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) | X10 != X14,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X14 = compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c26, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 X10 != X14,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c25])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a10, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X10 = X14).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c27, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c26])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a11, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X9 = X10).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c28, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c23])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(a12, assumption,
% 11.66/1.85 X9 = compose(a,X4)).
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c29, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c19])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 cnf(c30, plain,
% 11.66/1.85 $false,
% 11.66/1.85 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X0, h),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X1, g),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X2, h),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X3, compose(b,X1)),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X4, compose(b,X0)),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X5, compose(b,X0)),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X6, a),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X7, b),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X8, g),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X9, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X10, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X11, a),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X12, b),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X13, h),
% 11.66/1.85 bind(X14, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)))
% 11.66/1.85 ],
% 11.66/1.85 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12])).
% 11.66/1.85
% 11.66/1.85 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------