TSTP Solution File: CAT002-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.98s 1.17s
% Output   : Refutation 0.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   4 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(closure_of_composition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X,Y)
    | product(X,Y,compose(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',closure_of_composition) ).

cnf(associative_property1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | defined(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',associative_property1) ).

cnf(associative_property2,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ defined(Z,U)
    | defined(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',associative_property2) ).

cnf(category_theory_axiom2,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(Z,U,V)
    | ~ product(Y,U,W)
    | product(X,W,V) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',category_theory_axiom2) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product1,hypothesis,
    ( ~ product(a,X,Y)
    | ~ product(a,Z,Y)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product1) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product2,hypothesis,
    ( ~ product(b,X,Y)
    | ~ product(b,Z,Y)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product2) ).

cnf(ab_equals_c,hypothesis,
    product(a,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ab_equals_c) ).

cnf(ch_equals_d,hypothesis,
    product(c,h,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ch_equals_d) ).

cnf(cg_equals_d,hypothesis,
    product(c,g,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cg_equals_d) ).

cnf(prove_h_equals_g,negated_conjecture,
    h != g,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_h_equals_g) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    defined(c,h),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property1,ch_equals_d]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    defined(c,g),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property1,cg_equals_d]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    defined(b,h),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property2,25,ab_equals_c]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    defined(b,g),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property2,26,ab_equals_c]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    product(b,h,compose(b,h)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[closure_of_composition,58]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    product(b,g,compose(b,g)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[closure_of_composition,64]) ).

cnf(667,plain,
    product(a,compose(b,h),d),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom2,76,ab_equals_c,ch_equals_d]) ).

cnf(686,plain,
    product(a,compose(b,g),d),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom2,79,ab_equals_c,cg_equals_d]) ).

cnf(689,plain,
    ~ product(b,h,compose(b,g)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product2,79,prove_h_equals_g]) ).

cnf(1946,plain,
    compose(b,g) = compose(b,h),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product1,686,667]) ).

cnf(1947,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[76,689,1946,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CAT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 15:43:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T15:43:28
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T15:43:28
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Z ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?W)) (|product| ?X ?W ?V)).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?Z ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?X ?W)) (|product| ?W ?Y ?V)).
% 0.98/1.17  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.98/1.17  
% 0.98/1.17  #||
% 0.98/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/1.17  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.98/1.18  ||#
% 0.98/1.18  
% 0.98/1.18  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.98/1.18  ;     17003 formulas have been input or derived (from 234 formulas).
% 0.98/1.18  ;      1947 (11%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.98/1.18  ;         1263 (65%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.98/1.18  ;          684 (35%) are still being kept.
% 0.98/1.18  ; 
% 0.98/1.18  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.005   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (24 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.107  16%   Process new row              (14,104 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.392  57%   Resolution                   (466 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.005   1%   Paramodulation               (233 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (14 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.001   0%   Forward subsumption          (14 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (14 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (18 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.065   9%   Forward simplification       (12,672 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.041   6%   Backward simplification      (1,947 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (153 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.072  10%   Other
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.689        Total
% 0.98/1.18  ;     0.698        Real time
% 0.98/1.18  ; 
% 0.98/1.18  ; Term-hash-array has 2,461 terms in all.
% 0.98/1.18  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 14 entries (14 at peak, 14 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 22 nodes (22 at peak, 22 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ;  Retrieved 13 possibly forward subsuming rows in 14 calls.
% 0.98/1.18  ;  Retrieved 5 possibly backward subsumed rows in 14 calls.
% 0.98/1.18  ; Path-index has 949 entries (1,881 at peak, 2,471 added, 1,522 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ; Path-index has 1,234 nodes (1,613 at peak, 1,926 added, 692 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ; Trie-index has 949 entries (1,881 at peak, 2,471 added, 1,522 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ; Trie-index has 2,632 nodes (4,438 at peak, 5,841 added, 3,209 deleted).
% 0.98/1.18  ; Retrieved 19,491 generalization terms in 21,139 calls.
% 0.98/1.18  ; Retrieved 2,113 instance terms in 1,932 calls.
% 0.98/1.18  ; Retrieved 431,400 unifiable terms in 43,065 calls.
% 0.98/1.18  ; 
% 0.98/1.18  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 58 entries:
% 0.98/1.18  ;    58 with value 0
% 0.98/1.18  ; The agenda of rows to process has 51 entries:
% 0.98/1.18  ;    17 with value 14              4 with value 16              16 with value 17
% 0.98/1.18  ;    14 with value 15
% 0.98/1.18  ; The agenda of rows to give has 569 entries:
% 0.98/1.18  ;     6 with value (4 12)         69 with value (4 16)         124 with value (4 19)
% 0.98/1.18  ;    28 with value (4 13)        116 with value (4 17)          17 with value (4 20)
% 0.98/1.18  ;    56 with value (4 14)         69 with value (4 18)          18 with value (4 21)
% 0.98/1.18  ;    66 with value (4 15)
% 0.98/1.18  Evaluation took:
% 0.98/1.18    0.699 seconds of real time
% 0.98/1.18    0.636622 seconds of user run time
% 0.98/1.18    0.061776 seconds of system run time
% 0.98/1.18    [Run times include 0.037 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.98/1.18    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.98/1.18    0 page faults and
% 0.98/1.18    51,048,208 bytes consed.
% 0.98/1.18  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.98/1.18  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T15:43:28
% 0.98/1.18  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.98/1.18  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------